Reflecting on the Super Bowl Halftime Show

An op-ed on the cultural significance and reactions to the Super Bowl's halftime performance.

Published on Feb. 12, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The author reflects on the reactions to the Super Bowl halftime show, wondering about the perspectives and assumptions of those who criticized it. The piece explores themes of diversity, inclusion, and cross-cultural understanding, questioning why we expect entertainers to promote national unity while not holding elected officials to the same standard.

Why it matters

The Super Bowl halftime show is a high-profile cultural event that often sparks debate and controversy. This piece examines how the reactions to the performance can reveal deeper societal attitudes and assumptions around language, culture, and national identity.

The details

The author poses a series of thought-provoking questions about the halftime show, including: how many fans who complained also consumed typical Super Bowl snacks like tortilla chips and salsa, how many don't realize Puerto Rico is part of the US, how many Spanish-speaking children will be inspired to play football, and why we expect entertainers but not politicians to promote national unity.

  • The Super Bowl halftime show took place on February 12, 2026.

The players

Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio

Also known as Bad Bunny, a Puerto Rican singer and rapper who performed during the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“God bless America,”

— Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio

The takeaway

This piece encourages readers to reflect on their own assumptions and biases, and to strive for greater cross-cultural understanding and appreciation of diversity. It suggests that the reactions to the Super Bowl halftime show could have broader implications for issues of national identity and political discourse.