- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Chapel Hill Today
By the People, for the People
White biologist sues Cornell, alleging illegal race-based hiring
Lawsuit claims the university avoided a competitive search and excluded White candidates for a faculty position.
Published on Jan. 29, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A biologist has filed a lawsuit against Cornell University alleging the Ivy League school used unlawful race-based hiring practices and intentionally discriminated against qualified White candidates by refusing to consider them for a faculty position. The lawsuit claims Cornell violated federal law when it sought to fill the position several years ago, citing emails that allegedly said the department would invite only 'underrepresented minority scholars' and avoid a competitive search.
Why it matters
The case follows the Supreme Court's recent ruling against race-conscious college admissions and raises questions about the legality of diversity hiring practices in higher education. It comes as the Trump administration has pushed to end diversity, equity and inclusion efforts at colleges and universities.
The details
The lawsuit was filed by evolutionary biologist Colin Wright, who was a postdoctoral researcher at Pennsylvania State University at the time. Wright said he was well qualified for the tenure-track position at Cornell but did not learn of the opening until last year, when whistleblowers released emails allegedly showing the department planned to approach candidates one at a time until one accepted. The lawsuit cites Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and claims Wright was more qualified than the person who was hired, losing out on at least $700,000 in salary.
- In December 2020, emails from Cornell's Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department allegedly said the department would invite 'underrepresented minority scholars' and avoid a competitive search to make a 'diversity hire'.
- In 2023, the Supreme Court ruled that race-conscious college admissions amounted to unconstitutional discrimination in the case of Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College.
- In November 2026, Cornell reached a $60 million agreement with the Trump administration to restore frozen federal research funding and close investigations, agreeing to comply with federal civil rights law.
The players
Colin Wright
An evolutionary biologist who was a postdoctoral researcher at Pennsylvania State University at the time and is the plaintiff in the lawsuit against Cornell University.
Cornell University
The Ivy League school that is being sued by Colin Wright for allegedly using unlawful race-based hiring practices.
America First Policy Institute
The conservative think tank with close ties to the Trump administration that brought the case against Cornell University on behalf of Colin Wright.
Leigh Ann O'Neill
The chief legal affairs officer at the America First Policy Institute.
Kenji Yoshino
A law professor at New York University who co-wrote a forthcoming book on how to push back against attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion.
What they’re saying
“In this case, we're asking the court to uphold that same principle when making hiring decisions.”
— Leigh Ann O'Neill, Chief Legal Affairs Officer, America First Policy Institute
“Cornell's practices didn't just cost me a job; unknown numbers of other qualified candidates were also robbed of the chance to even be considered.”
— Colin Wright
“Universities are risk-averse, so they will stop doing it.”
— Kenji Yoshino, Law Professor, New York University
What’s next
The judge in the case will decide on whether to allow the lawsuit to proceed.
The takeaway
This case highlights the ongoing legal and political debates around diversity hiring practices in higher education, with the Supreme Court's recent ruling against race-conscious admissions policies likely to influence how universities approach faculty hiring going forward.





