NCAA Responds to Ruling Granting Ole Miss QB Extra Year of Eligibility

The association warns of broader consequences and urges Congress to take action.

Published on Feb. 13, 2026

The NCAA has issued a statement in response to a Mississippi judge's ruling that granted Ole Miss quarterback Trinidad Chambliss an extra year of eligibility, siding with the player in his fight for a medical redshirt. The NCAA warned that the decision illustrates the 'impossible situation' created by differing court rulings that undermine the association's eligibility rules agreed to by its member schools.

Why it matters

The NCAA's statement highlights the growing tension between the association's authority over college sports and the increasing number of legal challenges to its rules. This ruling could set a precedent that allows more athletes to seek additional eligibility through the courts, potentially disrupting the NCAA's ability to enforce its own regulations.

The details

Judge Robert Whitwell's order effectively blocks the NCAA from enforcing its eligibility decision against Chambliss while the broader case plays out. The NCAA said it will continue defending its eligibility standards, but argued that inconsistent state laws and conflicting court rulings have created instability across college sports. Chambliss, who previously led Ferris State to a Division II national championship before transferring to Ole Miss, had been denied three times by the NCAA in his bid for an additional season. University officials argued documented medical issues in 2022 warranted a hardship waiver.

  • On Thursday, a Mississippi judge granted Trinidad Chambliss an extra year of eligibility.
  • Hours after the ruling, the NCAA released a statement warning of broader consequences.

The players

Trinidad Chambliss

The Ole Miss quarterback who won a key courtroom victory that could reshape the future of college eligibility rules.

Judge Robert Whitwell

The Mississippi judge who granted Chambliss an extra year of eligibility, siding with the player in his fight for a medical redshirt.

NCAA

The national collegiate athletic association that oversees and regulates college sports in the United States.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This decision in a state court illustrates the impossible situation created by differing court decisions that serve to undermine rules agreed to by the same NCAA members who later challenge them in court.”

— NCAA (sportingnews.com)

“The patchwork of state laws and inconsistent, conflicting court decisions make partnering with Congress essential to provide stability for current and future college athletes.”

— NCAA (sportingnews.com)

What’s next

The NCAA said it will continue defending its eligibility standards against what it described as repeated legal challenges, and urged Congress to take action to provide stability for college athletes across the country.

The takeaway

This case highlights the growing tension between the NCAA's authority over college sports and the increasing number of legal challenges to its rules. The ruling in favor of Chambliss could set a precedent that allows more athletes to seek additional eligibility through the courts, potentially disrupting the NCAA's ability to enforce its own regulations and leading to further instability in college sports.