- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Hermann Today
By the People, for the People
Samsung and Apple Receive Low Repairability Scores Under New EPREL Framework
The latest Failings the Fix 2026 report using the EU's EPREL system reveals systemic tensions between product design and the right-to-repair movement.
Apr. 13, 2026 at 5:30am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The intricate digital infrastructure powering today's smartphones is increasingly at odds with the industry's push for sleek, non-repairable designs.Hermann TodayA new report from US PIRG using the EU's EPREL repairability framework has given low scores to two of the world's biggest smartphone brands - Apple received a D- and Samsung a D. The EPREL system emphasizes practical repair challenges like disassembly difficulty, spare part availability, and software support length, exposing a broader industry shift toward integrated, proprietary designs that limit DIY and third-party repair options.
Why it matters
The report's findings reflect growing tensions between premium hardware ambitions and the push for greater product longevity and sustainability. As devices become more integrated with services and software, the 'repairability' of a product is less about physical design and more about ecosystem choices that can restrict independent repair networks.
The details
The EPREL framework evaluates factors like disassembly difficulty, standard tool usage, spare part accessibility, repair documentation, and software support length. Apple and Samsung's low scores indicate design choices that prioritize sleek, integrated hardware over serviceability - such as using proprietary fasteners, limiting parts availability, and tying software updates to authorized repair channels.
- The Failings the Fix 2026 report was published on April 13, 2026.
The players
US PIRG
A consumer advocacy group that published the Failings the Fix 2026 report using the EU's EPREL repairability framework.
Apple
One of the world's largest smartphone manufacturers, which received a D- repairability score in the report.
Samsung
One of the world's largest smartphone manufacturers, which received a D repairability score in the report.
EPREL
The EU's repairability evaluation framework that the Failings the Fix 2026 report used to assess devices.
What they’re saying
“What this debate really exposes is a tension between luxury hardware ambitions and practical upkeep.”
— Virgilio Hermann JD, Author
What’s next
The report's findings are expected to reignite the broader debate around right-to-repair legislation and the role of repairability in consumer electronics design.
The takeaway
The low repairability scores for Apple and Samsung highlight an industry-wide challenge of balancing premium hardware features with the growing consumer and regulatory demand for more sustainable, repairable devices. This debate will likely shape future product design choices and policy discussions around electronic waste reduction.

