Rochester School Board Seeks Legislative Change to Election Structure

District aims to eliminate at-large seats in favor of geographic representation

Published on Mar. 4, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Rochester Public Schools Board of Education has unanimously approved a resolution to ask the Minnesota Legislature to restructure the district's school board election system. The current at-large system, where candidates run for any of the seven open seats, has been criticized as allowing "gamesmanship" and being "bad for democracy." The board plans to request a change to a geographic representation model, similar to the majority of school districts in the state.

Why it matters

The current at-large system in Rochester is unique, with only one other district in Minnesota using a similar structure. Proponents of the change argue it would improve democratic representation by allowing residents to vote only for candidates in their local area, rather than competing against candidates from across the entire district.

The details

The Rochester School Board voted 7-0 to approve the resolution, which will now be presented to the state legislature. If approved, the change would alter the way candidates seek election in November. Currently, candidates can choose to run for any of the seven at-large seats. Under the proposed structure, the seats would be divided geographically, so residents would only vote for candidates in their local area.

  • The school board discussed the possibility at a previous meeting, but tabled the decision to gather community input.
  • The board unanimously approved the resolution on March 3, 2026.
  • The legislature will need to respond by the end of June 2026 in order for the changes to be implemented before the general election in November.

The players

Rochester Public Schools Board of Education

The governing body of the Rochester, Minnesota school district that voted to request the legislative change.

Minnesota Legislature

The state legislative body that will need to approve any changes to the Rochester school board election structure.

Jean Marvin

A Rochester School Board member who stated the board has not heard from anyone who supports the current at-large system.

Cathy Nathan

The Rochester School Board chairwoman, who said the board needs to know the legislature's response by the end of June in order to meet candidate filing deadlines.

Justin Cook

A Rochester School Board member who previously raised concerns about the current at-large system, describing it as allowing "gamesmanship" and being "bad for democracy."

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Over the last two weeks, I don't think any of us have been contacted by anyone who said they are really enamored with the alley system.”

— Jean Marvin, Rochester School Board member (postbulletin.com)

“We'll need to know by the end of June in time for the start of the filing period for candidates on July 14.”

— Cathy Nathan, Rochester School Board Chairwoman (postbulletin.com)

What’s next

The Minnesota Legislature will need to respond to the Rochester School Board's request by the end of June 2026 in order for any changes to be implemented before the November general election.

The takeaway

This proposed change to Rochester's unique at-large school board election system highlights ongoing debates around democratic representation and the pros and cons of geographic versus at-large voting structures. The outcome could serve as a model for other districts considering similar reforms.