Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Trump's Birthright Citizenship Ban

Justices appear skeptical of administration's case, but the mere fact it reached the high court shows how much ground nativists have gained.

Apr. 1, 2026 at 11:39pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Supreme Court heard arguments in Trump v. Barbara, a case challenging President Donald Trump's 2025 executive order banning birthright citizenship. While the justices seemed skeptical of the administration's arguments, the fact that the case reached the high court at all demonstrates the significant ground nativists have gained since Trump's first term.

Why it matters

The 14th Amendment is clear that 'all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.' Trump's order seeks to overturn this and create a new, effectively stateless American underclass. If the court sides with Trump, it would call into question the citizenship of millions of children and represent a major blow to constitutional protections.

The details

Hours after being sworn back into office for his second term, Trump issued an executive order titled 'Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship.' Under the order, children born to undocumented mothers or women in the country on non-immigrant visas would no longer be citizens upon birth, unless the children's fathers were citizens or permanent residents. The order was immediately challenged in court, and several federal injunctions prevented its implementation, meaning birthright citizenship remains the law of the land for now.

  • In 2019, Trump called birthright citizenship a 'magnet for illegal immigration.'
  • Last year, presidential adviser Stephen Miller said the US-born children of immigrants are just as much of a problem as the immigrants themselves.

The players

Donald Trump

The former president who issued the executive order banning birthright citizenship.

Karen Tumlin

The director of the Justice Action Center, who called the case a 'canary in the coalmine for our democracy.'

Norman Wong

A direct descendant of Wong Kim Ark, whose family embodies the high stakes of this case.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“If the court sides with Trump, it will have to decide on a date on which to begin applying the president's interpretation of the 14th amendment. Anyone born on or after that date and described in Trump's order would be treated as a migrant rather than a U.S. citizen.”

— César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, Professor of civil rights and civil liberties at the Ohio State University College of Law

“They will be shamed for history if they get this wrong.”

— Norman Wong

What’s next

If the court sides with Trump, it will have to determine the effective date of the new interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which could call into question the citizenship of millions of children.

The takeaway

This case highlights the significant ground nativists have gained in recent years, with the Trump administration seeking to narrow who counts as an American and restrict participation in public life for noncitizens. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the future of citizenship and constitutional protections in the United States.