Judges Criticize Florida AG Bondi Over 'Eyebrow-Raising' Social Media Posts

Pam Bondi accused of violating court orders by publicizing arrests on X

Feb. 28, 2026 at 1:49am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Two federal judges in Minnesota have criticized Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi for using social media to publicize a string of arrests tied to the Trump administration's immigration enforcement surge, saying her posts violated court orders sealing the cases and exposed defendants to potential 'doxxing'.

Why it matters

The judges' criticism highlights concerns over government officials using social media to publicly shame or expose defendants before they are convicted, which can undermine the presumption of innocence and raise privacy issues.

The details

In one case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Dulce Foster said Bondi's posts on X, which included names and photos of defendants shortly after their arrests, 'violated a court order' sealing the cases. The judge said the government 'failed to respect Ms. Flores's dignity and privacy, exposed her to a risk of doxxing, and generally thumbed its nose at the notion that defendants are innocent until proven guilty.' In a separate case, Magistrate Judge Shannon Elkins directed prosecutors to address whether Bondi's posts violated another sealing order.

  • On February 28, 2026, the Politico report on the judges' criticism was published.

The players

Pam Bondi

The Attorney General of Florida who is accused of violating court orders by publicizing arrests on social media.

Dulce Foster

A U.S. Magistrate Judge in Minnesota who criticized Bondi's social media posts for violating a court order sealing a case.

Shannon Elkins

A U.S. Magistrate Judge in Minneapolis who directed prosecutors to address whether Bondi's social media posts violated a sealing order in another case.

Nitzana Flores

A defendant accused of attacking two Border Patrol agents, whose case was the subject of one of Bondi's social media posts that the judge said violated a sealing order.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The post also directly violated a court order sealing the case. Notwithstanding, the government now seeks an accommodation from the Court that it blatantly failed to give Ms. Flores and her codefendants.”

— Dulce Foster, U.S. Magistrate Judge (Politico)

“The government 'failed to respect Ms. Flores's dignity and privacy, exposed her to a risk of doxxing, and generally thumbed its nose at the notion that defendants are innocent until proven guilty.'”

— Dulce Foster, U.S. Magistrate Judge (Politico)

What’s next

The government has been directed to address the judges' concerns about the social media posts violating sealing orders in the cases.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing tension between government transparency and defendants' rights to privacy and presumption of innocence, especially when officials use social media to publicize arrests before trials have concluded.