Federal Probe Launched into ICE Shooting Incident in Minneapolis

Video evidence contradicts officers' sworn statements about the incident involving a Venezuelan man

Published on Feb. 14, 2026

Federal authorities have launched an investigation into two U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers who allegedly made untruthful statements under oath about a shooting incident that occurred in Minneapolis last month involving a Venezuelan man. The investigation was prompted after video evidence emerged that appeared to contradict the officers' accounts of the incident.

Why it matters

This case is the latest in a series of incidents where video evidence has contradicted official accounts provided by ICE officers, raising concerns about transparency and accountability within the agency. The shooting of the Venezuelan man in Minneapolis has sparked outrage in the local community and renewed calls for greater oversight and reform of ICE's practices.

The details

According to the initial reports, the two ICE officers were attempting to apprehend the Venezuelan man, who they claimed was resisting arrest, when one of the officers opened fire, seriously injuring the man. However, video footage of the incident appears to show a different sequence of events that contradicts the officers' sworn statements.

  • The shooting incident occurred in Minneapolis last month.

The players

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

The federal law enforcement agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws in the United States.

Venezuelan man

The individual who was shot by the ICE officers in Minneapolis.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must get to the bottom of this incident and hold any officers accountable who have made false statements under oath.”

— Unnamed federal official

What’s next

The federal investigation into the ICE officers' conduct is ongoing, and the findings will likely have significant implications for the agency's policies and practices.

The takeaway

This case highlights the importance of transparency and accountability within law enforcement agencies, especially when it comes to the use of force against vulnerable populations. The discrepancy between the officers' sworn statements and the video evidence underscores the need for greater oversight and independent review of such incidents.