- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Carlton Today
By the People, for the People
Carlton County Weighs $22M-$32M Options for Historic Courthouse
Commissioners consider expanding, renovating, or replacing the 100-year-old building.
Published on Mar. 6, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Carlton County commissioners are considering options ranging from $22 million to $32 million to address the future of the historic Carlton County Courthouse. The options include expanding and renovating the existing facilities or constructing a new office building on the campus. Architects and contractors presented a 30-page report outlining several project possibilities, with commissioners needing to make a decision by May to start construction in a year.
Why it matters
The 100-year-old Carlton County Historic Courthouse has become crowded, with offices in need of upgrades for heating, cooling, fire suppression, accessibility, and security. The county has committed to keeping the historic courthouse, but must weigh the costs and benefits of renovating the existing structure versus building new facilities.
The details
The report presented four main options for the courthouse's future: 1) New one- or two-story builds costing $21.8 million to $29.3 million, 2) Renovating and remodeling the courthouse and former law enforcement center for $26.4 million to $31.4 million, 3) Focusing renovations solely on the courthouse while demolishing the jail and law enforcement center for $25.3 million to $29.5 million, and 4) Fitting all county departments into a renovated courthouse. The historic significance of the courthouse will also require negotiation with preservation authorities for certain renovation work.
- The commissioners have until May to decide which direction they want to go.
- Construction is proposed to start in a year from now.
The players
Dan Reed
A county commissioner who expressed dislike for modern construction and prefers preserving the historic courthouse.
Tom Proulx
A county commissioner who reminded attendees that the county made a commitment to Carlton to keep the courthouse.
Carey Ottman Everson
A project manager at Duluth-based Adolphson and Peterson Construction, who described one of the Historic Courthouse renovation choices as a "complete gut."
Erik Daniels
A project manager at Klein McCarthy Architects, who presented the four main options for the courthouse's future.
Dennis Genereau
The county administrator, who said the study tried to "anticipate reasonable growth" in office space needs.
What they’re saying
“I've never been real fond of modern construction.”
— Dan Reed, County Commissioner (Pine Knot News)
“If it's being remodeled, it's a complete gut.”
— Carey Ottman Everson, Project Manager, Adolphson and Peterson Construction (Pine Knot News)
“We can fit everyone in there.”
— Erik Daniels, Project Manager, Klein McCarthy Architects (Pine Knot News)
What’s next
The study and assessment are being returned to the building committee, headed by property management director Dave Hurst. Hurst and the committee are expected to field individual questions from commissioners and meet again on March 18. The board will readdress the topic at the next committee of the whole meeting at 4:30 p.m. April 7 in Cromwell. A recommendation from the building committee is anticipated to come in May, with a board vote expected later that month on the preferred project option.
The takeaway
Carlton County faces a significant decision on the future of its historic 100-year-old courthouse, weighing the costs and benefits of renovating the existing structure versus building new facilities. The outcome will impact the county's administrative offices and services for years to come.


