- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Lansing Today
By the People, for the People
State Agencies Question Consumers Energy's Dam Sale Plan
Regulators raise concerns over Consumers Energy's proposal to sell its hydroelectric dams to a private equity firm.
Published on Feb. 12, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Consumers Energy is facing pushback from multiple state agencies over its plan to sell its collection of 13 hydroelectric dams to a Maryland-based private equity firm for $13 million. The state's Attorney General's office, Department of Natural Resources, and Michigan Public Service Commission have all submitted filings questioning the cost-effectiveness of the deal or outright opposing the plan. Consumers argues the private equity firm has the capital resources to bring the aging dams into compliance, but regulators want more proof this is the best option.
Why it matters
The sale of Consumers Energy's hydroelectric dams to a private equity firm is a significant move that could impact electricity rates and the long-term maintenance of critical infrastructure. State agencies are scrutinizing the deal to ensure it is in the best interest of Michigan ratepayers and the environment.
The details
Consumers Energy announced late last year that it plans to sell its 13 hydroelectric dams to a Maryland-based private equity firm. The private equity firm would then sell the electricity generated by the dams back to Consumers Energy under a 30-year contract. Consumers argues this would be more cost-effective than the company repairing and operating the aging dams itself. However, the Attorney General's office, Department of Natural Resources, and Michigan Public Service Commission have all raised concerns about the deal, questioning whether it is truly the most cost-effective option and voicing opposition. The MPSC, which has final say on the decision, is expected to rule on the plan in the coming weeks or months.
- Consumers Energy announced the dam sale plan in late 2025.
- State agencies have submitted filings questioning or opposing the plan in early 2026.
The players
Consumers Energy
A Michigan-based public utility company that provides electricity and natural gas to customers across the state.
Michigan Public Service Commission
The state regulatory body that has final say on Consumers Energy's proposed dam sale plan.
Maryland-based private equity firm
The firm that Consumers Energy plans to sell its 13 hydroelectric dams to.
Michigan Attorney General's office
The state agency that has submitted a filing questioning the cost-effectiveness of Consumers Energy's dam sale plan.
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
The state agency that has voiced opposition to Consumers Energy's dam sale plan.
What’s next
The Michigan Public Service Commission is expected to rule on Consumers Energy's dam sale plan in the coming weeks or months.
The takeaway
This case highlights the complex issues surrounding the ownership and maintenance of critical energy infrastructure, and the need for state regulators to carefully scrutinize any proposed changes to ensure they are in the best interest of ratepayers and the environment.


