EPA Weakens Air Pollution Rules, Putting Black Women's Health at Risk

Asthma death rates for Black women are four times higher than for white men in polluted communities.

Mar. 16, 2026 at 7:07pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The EPA is rolling back air pollution regulations, no longer calculating the human health costs of new rules and instead focusing only on industry benefits. This disproportionately impacts Black women, who already face asthma death rates four times higher than white men in polluted areas. Detroit environmental activist Rhonda Anderson calls the EPA's actions "devastating" for her community, which has high rates of industrial facilities and poor air quality.

Why it matters

Black women and their families are bearing the brunt of the EPA's deregulation, which favors industry over public health. They are more likely to live in areas with high air pollution and have less access to quality healthcare, putting them at greater risk of asthma and other pollution-related illnesses.

The details

The EPA has overturned dozens of air pollution regulations, exempted over 100 industrial facilities from stricter rules, and will no longer calculate the human health costs when making new pollution rules. Experts say this shift prioritizes industry profits over public health, especially for communities of color like Detroit's southwest side where Rhonda Anderson works. Black women already face asthma death rates four times higher than white men, and the EPA's actions will exacerbate these disparities.

  • In the last year, the EPA has taken steps to weaken air pollution regulations.
  • Just a year ago, a fifth grader in Detroit passed away from an asthma attack.

The players

Rhonda Anderson

An environmental justice organizer with the Sierra Club in Detroit, who has spent nearly three decades fighting for clean air and water in her community.

Lynne Bosma

The health equity director with the Asthma and Allergy Foundation, who notes that half of children with asthma in the U.S. are covered by Medicaid or CHIP.

Sarah Vogel

A senior vice president of healthy communities with the Environmental Defense Fund, who believes the EPA is eliminating the calculation of health costs to benefit industry.

Dr. Panagis Galiatsatos

A spokesperson for the American Lung Association, who says the EPA's actions will cost American lives.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Just looking at my little world, we've worked so hard to get a lot of these things recognized.”

— Rhonda Anderson, Environmental justice organizer (Detroit Free Press)

“If individuals that need that access lose it, they are going to struggle to get medication, specialty care access, and then emergency care as well.”

— Lynne Bosma, Health equity director (Detroit Free Press)

“The reason they eliminated it is because air pollution has a huge impact on our health. Industries don't like that because it shows the benefit of stricter regulations, which are more costly for polluters.”

— Sarah Vogel, Senior vice president of healthy communities (Detroit Free Press)

“American lives will be the cost.”

— Dr. Panagis Galiatsatos, Spokesperson (Detroit Free Press)

What’s next

The EPA has not provided a timeline for when it will resume calculating the human health costs of new pollution regulations.

The takeaway

The EPA's rollback of air pollution rules disproportionately harms Black women and their families, who already face higher rates of asthma and other health issues due to environmental injustice. This decision prioritizes industry profits over public health, and community advocates are calling for the EPA to reverse course and protect vulnerable populations.