Maine Debates $5M Annual Fund for Family Planning Services

Proposal aims to safeguard reproductive health care amid potential federal funding cuts.

Published on Feb. 26, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Maine State House is considering a proposal to create a $5 million annual fund for family planning services in the state. The bill, sponsored by Democratic Rep. Amy Kuhn, also includes contingency measures in case the federal government cuts funding tied to programs like Title X or MaineCare. Supporters say the funding would help support 63 clinics statewide that provide a range of non-abortion health services, while opponents argue the money could be better used elsewhere.

Why it matters

This proposal comes amid concerns that federal funding for family planning services could be reduced, potentially leaving Maine taxpayers responsible for making up the difference. The debate highlights the ongoing political tensions around reproductive health care and how states are responding to potential changes in federal policy.

The details

LD 335 has three main components: 1) Creating a $5 million annual state fund for family planning services, 2) Requiring the state to make up any reductions in federal funding tied to Title X or MaineCare, which could cost an additional $5 million, and 3) Expanding access to family planning services, especially in rural areas. Supporters argue the funding is crucial to maintain a wide range of non-abortion health services, while opponents say the money could be better used for other priorities like veterans' homes and nursing homes.

  • The Maine State House is currently debating LD 335.
  • If passed, the $5 million annual fund would begin in the next fiscal year.

The players

Rep. Amy Kuhn

The Democratic state representative from Falmouth who sponsored LD 335.

Sen. Marianne Moore

The Republican state senator from Calais who sits on the Health and Human Services Committee and expressed concerns about the funding proposal.

Planned Parenthood of Northern New England

One of the primary beneficiaries of the proposed funding, which they say would "fill holes created by attacks on federal funding streams that do not cover abortions and enhance family planning funding for non-abortion services."

Maine Family Planning

Another major provider that would benefit from the funding, which they say could allow them to expand services into rural areas with limited health care options.

Ellen Taraschi

A nurse practitioner who works for Maine Family Planning's mobile medical unit, providing preventive care like wound care and HIV prevention.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“I'm very proud to sponsor LD 335, an act to safeguard reproductive health care. This is a really fundamental right to make choices about one's own life.”

— Rep. Amy Kuhn (newscentermaine.com)

“It's funding that we could use for our veterans' homes, we could use it for our nursing homes, we could use it for our hospitals.”

— Sen. Marianne Moore (newscentermaine.com)

“We should use that money to support women who want to have their children, who need to have local care.”

— Ann Ross, Hampden resident (newscentermaine.com)

“I spend most of my time doing wound care. I spend a lot of time doing pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV.”

— Ellen Taraschi, Nurse practitioner, Maine Family Planning (newscentermaine.com)

What’s next

The Maine State House will continue debating LD 335 in the coming weeks, with a vote expected before the end of the legislative session.

The takeaway

This debate highlights the ongoing political tensions around reproductive health care and the challenges states face in maintaining access to family planning services, especially in rural areas, amid potential changes in federal funding.