Maryland Housing Algorithm Legislation Raises Concerns

Free market solutionists and community groups warn of unintended consequences on housing access and affordability.

Published on Mar. 2, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Proposed Maryland legislation to ban the algorithmic software used by the housing industry to price apartments and homes is raising concerns from economic empowerment organizations and civil rights activists. While the bills aim to lower housing costs, critics argue the regulations could actually reduce housing availability and increase rents, especially in vulnerable communities.

Why it matters

This legislation highlights the complex dynamics of housing affordability, with policymakers seeking to address high rents while community groups warn of potential unintended consequences that could further limit housing access for working-class families.

The details

Maryland House Bill 34 and the Montgomery County Council's Algorithmic Price Fixing Act seek to ban the use of algorithmic pricing software by landlords and property managers. Supporters argue this will promote free markets and lower housing costs. However, organizations like the Frederick Douglass Freedom Alliance and the Talbot County Chapter of the National Action Network warn that banning these tools could lead to more vacant units, weaken incentives for new affordable housing, and ultimately result in higher rents as the housing shortage persists.

  • The Maryland General Assembly and Montgomery County Council are currently considering the legislation.
  • House Bill 34 is scheduled for a hearing on February 19.

The players

Maryland House Bill 34

Legislation introduced by Delegates Julie Palakovich Carr and Vaughn Stewart to ban algorithmic rent-pricing software.

Montgomery County Council's Algorithmic Price Fixing Act

Legislation introduced by Councilmember Will Jawando to ban algorithmic rent-pricing software.

Troy Rolling

President and CEO of the Frederick Douglass Freedom Alliance, a grassroots organization focused on economic empowerment in urban communities.

Kennedie Stepp

Vice president of the Talbot County Chapter of Rev. Al Sharpton's National Action Network.

David J. Byrd

Economic empowerment activist who previously served in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Banning tools that promote responsive pricing and higher occupancy could lead to more vacant units, weaker incentives for new affordable housing developments, fewer investments in vulnerable communities, and ultimately higher rents as the housing shortage persists or worsens.”

— Kennedie Stepp, Vice president of the Talbot County Chapter of Rev. Al Sharpton's National Action Network (Letter to the House Economic Matters Committee)

“Blaming software for the high price of rent is akin to blaming the thermometer because you have a fever. The simple truth is that the government could outlaw this software tomorrow and rents would stay the same as no software can extinguish the law of supply and demand.”

— David J. Byrd, Economic empowerment activist (The Baltimore Sun)

“Banning this algorithmic technology will discourage even more builders and landlords from maintaining rental properties here, further limiting the number of units available while increasing their costs.”

— Troy Rolling, President and CEO of the Frederick Douglass Freedom Alliance (Press release)

What’s next

House Bill 34 is scheduled for a hearing on February 19, where lawmakers will further consider the legislation.

The takeaway

This debate over housing algorithm legislation highlights the complex tradeoffs between affordability and housing supply, with community groups warning that well-intentioned policies could have unintended consequences that harm the very people they aim to help.