Supreme Court to Review Pregnancy Retaliation Lawsuit

Case centers on pleading requirements for defendants in civil lawsuits.

Mar. 30, 2026 at 2:27pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A dimly lit, cinematic government office space with warm sunlight streaming through the windows, creating dramatic shadows and a sense of quiet contemplation around the legal issues at hand.The Supreme Court's review of this pregnancy discrimination case could reshape the legal landscape for how defendants must plead their defenses.Fulton Today

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider a dispute over pleading requirements in a lawsuit accusing a former Georgia prosecutor of firing a deputy after being informed she was pregnant. The case centers on whether a defendant can assert an affirmative defense as the basis for a summary judgment motion, even if they failed to plead that defense in their initial answer to the lawsuit.

Why it matters

This case could have significant implications for how defendants must plead their defenses in civil lawsuits, potentially impacting future pregnancy discrimination and retaliation cases.

The details

Jasmine Younge accused former Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard of firing her after she informed him of her pregnancy. The case granted by the Supreme Court focuses on the technical requirements for defendants under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically whether they can raise new defenses later in the litigation process.

  • The Supreme Court agreed to take up the case on March 30, 2026.

The players

Jasmine Younge

A former deputy who filed a lawsuit accusing her former boss of firing her due to her pregnancy.

Paul Howard

The former district attorney of Fulton County, Georgia, who was accused of firing Younge after she informed him of her pregnancy.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments and issue a ruling on the pleading requirements issue in the case.

The takeaway

This case will provide important guidance on the procedural rules defendants must follow when asserting defenses in civil lawsuits, which could impact the viability of future pregnancy discrimination and retaliation claims.