COPT Defense Properties and RLJ Lodging Trust Compared

A look at the financial performance and key metrics of these two finance companies

Published on Feb. 27, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

COPT Defense Properties (NYSE:CDP) and RLJ Lodging Trust (NYSE:RLJ) are both finance companies, but which one is the better business? This article compares the two companies across various factors like dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, and risk.

Why it matters

Investors looking to invest in the finance sector may be interested in understanding how these two companies compare in order to make an informed decision about which one could be the better investment.

The details

The analysis finds that COPT Defense Properties has a lower beta suggesting its share price is less volatile than the S&P 500, while RLJ Lodging Trust has a higher beta indicating more volatility. COPT Defense Properties also has stronger consensus ratings from analysts and higher potential upside based on the average target price. However, RLJ Lodging Trust has a higher dividend yield and a longer track record of dividend growth. Overall, the data shows COPT Defense Properties outperforms RLJ Lodging Trust on more factors compared.

  • The analysis is based on data reported as of February 27, 2026.

The players

COPT Defense Properties

A real estate investment trust that acquires, develops, manages, sells, and leases out office properties and data centers.

RLJ Lodging Trust

A self-advised, publicly traded real estate investment trust that owns primarily premium-branded, high-margin, focused-service and compact full-service hotels.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

The takeaway

This analysis provides investors with a comprehensive comparison of two finance companies, COPT Defense Properties and RLJ Lodging Trust, to help inform investment decisions in the sector. The data shows COPT Defense Properties has some advantages over RLJ Lodging Trust, but investors should consider their individual investment goals and risk preferences when evaluating these two options.