Debate over Voter ID Laws Intensifies

Proponents say it protects elections, critics argue it discourages voting

Published on Feb. 17, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The debate over voter ID laws has intensified, with proponents arguing they are necessary to protect election integrity, while critics contend they disproportionately disenfranchise certain groups of voters. While polls show broad public support for voter ID requirements, the issue remains politically divisive, with accusations of partisan motives on both sides.

Why it matters

Voter ID laws have become a flashpoint in the ongoing battle over voting rights and election security. The outcome of this debate could have significant implications for voter turnout and the fairness of future elections.

The details

Maryland is one of 14 states, along with Washington D.C., that do not require voters to provide any documentation when they show up to vote. Other states have various ID requirements, though some allow exemptions on religious grounds. Proponents of voter ID laws, including former President Trump and many Republicans, claim they are necessary to prevent voter fraud, despite a lack of evidence that such fraud is widespread. Critics argue these laws disproportionately burden certain groups, including minorities, low-income individuals, the elderly, and young adults, who are less likely to have government-issued photo IDs.

  • In 2020, former President Trump made unsubstantiated claims that the election was 'stolen' due to voter fraud.
  • In 2021, the GOP-controlled Congress introduced the SAVE Act, which would mandate voter ID requirements nationwide.

The players

Donald Trump

Former President of the United States who made false claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.

Peter Jensen

Editorial writer at The Baltimore Sun who argues that voter ID laws are intended to discourage voting by certain groups.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Such rampant fraud has never been documented, of course. It's not even especially believable as it hinges on the notion that an adult on the run from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and facing potential imprisonment, deportation or worse is going to make standing in line at a local polling place surrounded by government officials a big priority.”

— Peter Jensen, Editorial Writer (The Baltimore Sun)

“Is this about protecting elections or protecting GOP power in the midterms and beyond?”

— Peter Jensen, Editorial Writer (The Baltimore Sun)

What’s next

The debate over voter ID laws is expected to continue as the 2024 presidential election approaches, with both sides making their case to the public and policymakers.

The takeaway

The voter ID debate highlights the ongoing tension between efforts to secure elections and concerns about disenfranchising certain groups of voters. As the country grapples with this issue, it will be crucial for policymakers to find a balanced approach that protects the integrity of elections without unduly burdening the right to vote.