- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
U.S. Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Accusing J&J of Fraud Over Talc Bankruptcy Strategy
The lawsuit alleged J&J used bankruptcy to put billions out of reach of cancer victims suing over talc products.
Jan. 29, 2026 at 7:07pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A U.S. district judge has dismissed a lawsuit alleging Johnson & Johnson committed fraud by repeatedly attempting to use a shell company's bankruptcy to resolve tens of thousands of lawsuits claiming its baby powder and other talc products caused cancer. The judge ruled the cancer victims could not show they were harmed by the bankruptcy delays, which stopped their cases from moving ahead for several years.
Why it matters
This ruling is a setback for cancer victims seeking compensation from J&J over its talc products. The company has faced tens of thousands of lawsuits alleging its talc-based products contained asbestos and caused ovarian and other cancers. J&J has maintained its products are safe, but has lost several substantial verdicts in court.
The details
The lawsuit was filed by five cancer victims suing J&J over its talc products. They alleged J&J's bankruptcy strategy was designed to put billions of dollars out of plaintiffs' reach to "hinder, delay, and defraud these women and prevent them from ever having their day in court." However, the judge ruled the victims could not show they were harmed by the bankruptcy delays, which stopped their cases from moving ahead between 2021 and 2025.
- The lawsuit was filed in January 2024.
- The judge dismissed the lawsuit on January 29, 2026.
The players
Johnson & Johnson (J&J)
A multinational corporation that develops medical devices, pharmaceutical, and consumer packaged goods.
Red River Talc
A shell company used by J&J in its bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc lawsuits.
U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp
The judge who dismissed the lawsuit against J&J.
Patricia Kipnis
An attorney representing the five cancer victims suing J&J.
Erik Haas
Worldwide vice president of litigation for J&J.
What they’re saying
“We disagree with the decision and will be reviewing it with our clients to discuss an appeal.”
— Patricia Kipnis, Attorney for the cancer victims
“The court correctly rejected the wholly meritless claims in the lawsuit.”
— Erik Haas, Worldwide vice president of litigation for J&J
What’s next
The cancer victims' attorneys say they will review the judge's decision and discuss the possibility of appealing the ruling.
The takeaway
This ruling is a setback for cancer victims seeking compensation from J&J, but the legal battle over the company's talc products is far from over. J&J has faced thousands of lawsuits and substantial verdicts, though it has also won some cases outright.
Baltimore top stories
Baltimore events
Mar. 20, 2026
Joyce Manor, Militarie Gun, Teen Mortgage, & CombatMar. 20, 2026
Screeching Weasel



