Man Facing 24 Charges for Campus Peeping Tom Incidents

Tsague Georges Albert Tadonki Jr. was arrested and held without bond for alleged voyeurism at Anne Arundel Community College.

Published on Feb. 24, 2026

A 20-year-old Laurel man named Tsague Georges Albert Tadonki Jr. was arrested on Wednesday and charged with 24 counts related to peeping and surveillance incidents that allegedly occurred at Anne Arundel Community College between February 11-12, 2026. Tadonki was taken into custody without incident and is being held without bond pending a bail review hearing.

Why it matters

These types of voyeurism and privacy invasion incidents can have a significant impact on victims and the broader campus community, raising concerns about safety and security. The case highlights the need for vigilance and strong enforcement to protect students, faculty, and staff from such intrusive and unacceptable behavior.

The details

According to court records, Tadonki faces eight counts each of peeping tom, visual surveillance of a private area, and private place with prurient intent. All charges are misdemeanors, but probable cause was found in each count. Tadonki was arrested at an apartment complex in Laurel by warrant officers and is being held without bond following a bail determination on February 18th.

  • The alleged incidents occurred between February 11-12, 2026.
  • Tadonki was arrested on February 18, 2026.
  • A bail review hearing is scheduled for 10:30 a.m. on February 19, 2026.

The players

Tsague Georges Albert Tadonki Jr.

A 20-year-old man from Laurel, Maryland who was arrested and charged with 24 counts related to peeping and surveillance incidents at Anne Arundel Community College.

Anne Arundel Community College

The college where the alleged peeping tom and surveillance incidents took place.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide at the bail review hearing on February 19th whether or not to allow Tsague Georges Albert Tadonki Jr. to be released on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights the need for colleges and universities to have robust security measures and policies in place to protect students, faculty, and staff from invasions of privacy and voyeurism. It also underscores the importance of swift law enforcement action to address such unacceptable behavior and hold perpetrators accountable.