Harvard Students Criticize 'Salient' Magazine Relaunch

Conservative student publication faces backlash after past publication of antisemitic, sexist, and racist content

Mar. 13, 2026 at 2:34am

After a leadership shakeup and suspension of the 'Salient' conservative student magazine at Harvard due to the publication of offensive and hateful content, the publication has relaunched with new interim leadership. However, many Harvard students remain skeptical and critical of the 'Salient's' efforts to reset, with some saying the relaunch feels 'gimmicky' and disconnected from the magnitude of the previous controversies.

Why it matters

The 'Salient' controversy has become a flashpoint in the ongoing national debate around ideological diversity and inclusion on college campuses, with the prestige of the Harvard brand amplifying the scrutiny. The incident also raises questions about how universities should balance free speech principles with the need to maintain an inclusive environment.

The details

In late 2025, the 'Salient' board suspended publication after drafts surfaced containing antisemitic, sexist, and racist content, including an article that mirrored rhetoric from Adolf Hitler's 1939 Reichstag speech. Internal documents also revealed casual use of racial slurs and unpublished content featuring Nazi symbols and calls for mass executions. After months of turmoil and resignations, the 'Salient' is now trying to rebuild under new interim leadership, but many students remain skeptical of the relaunch effort.

  • In late October 2025, the 'Salient' board announced it would suspend publication.
  • In December 2025, internal documents tied to a student complaint revealed the magazine's problematic culture.
  • On February 27, 2026, the 'Salient' publicly relaunched with new interim leadership.

The players

Aaron Thompson '27

A Harvard undergraduate who expressed skepticism about the 'Salient' relaunch, saying 'Neo-Nazis at Harvard? Not surprised.'

Keri Collins '29

The new interim president of the 'Salient' magazine, tasked with overseeing the publication's restructuring.

David Army '28

A former 'Salient' writer who authored a controversial article in September 2025 that included rhetoric mirroring Adolf Hitler's 1939 Reichstag speech.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“They're just very 'red pill,' irritating men, you know? Just terrible.”

— Anonymous Mather House sophomore (Harvard Independent)

“I think the revamp is a scam.”

— Anonymous Cabot House sophomore (Harvard Independent)

“I don't necessarily know if there's a need for it. This whole revival campaign feels more gimmicky than anything.”

— Aaron Thompson '27 (Harvard Independent)

What’s next

The 'Salient' is attempting to rebuild under new interim leadership, with a pledge to abandon pseudonyms and restructure editorial oversight. However, many Harvard students remain skeptical about the publication's ability to meaningfully address its past controversies.

The takeaway

The 'Salient' controversy has become a flashpoint in the ongoing national debate around ideological diversity and inclusion on college campuses, raising questions about how universities should balance free speech principles with the need to maintain an inclusive environment. The incident also highlights the heightened scrutiny that prestigious institutions like Harvard face when dealing with such controversies.