LAPD & Flock: License Plate Readers Raise Privacy Concerns in LA

Automated license plate readers are expanding, but critics warn of potential abuses and erosion of civil liberties.

Published on Mar. 2, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Across the nation, cities are grappling with the implications of widespread surveillance technology like automated license plate readers (ALPRs). While proponents tout their crime-fighting capabilities, a growing chorus of privacy advocates and concerned citizens are raising alarms about potential abuses and the erosion of civil liberties, especially as data collected by these systems has been accessed by federal agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Why it matters

The use of ALPRs, particularly those powered by AI like Flock Safety's technology, has expanded rapidly, with the systems being deployed not just by law enforcement but also private citizens, homeowners associations, and businesses. This has led to a dense network of cameras capturing vast amounts of data on vehicle movements, raising concerns about privacy violations and the potential for tracking individuals without warrants.

The details

Modern ALPR systems go beyond simply recording license plate numbers, utilizing AI to document vehicle make, model, color, and even distinctive markings like scratches or dents. This detailed information, combined with location data, creates a comprehensive record of vehicle movements, which critics argue could be misused, even in the absence of a specific criminal investigation.

  • In December, Cambridge, Massachusetts, ended its contract with Flock Safety due to privacy concerns.
  • Santa Cruz, California, recently terminated its contract with Flock Safety after learning its data had been accessed by out-of-state agencies, citing threats to civil liberties.

The players

Flock Safety

A leading provider of ALPR technology, marketed to both law enforcement and private citizens.

LAPD

The Los Angeles Police Department, which touts ALPR technology as a valuable investigative tool and remains a significant customer of Flock Safety.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

Several states and cities are enacting laws aimed at curbing the use of surveillance technology and protecting privacy, and some cities are exploring alternatives to widespread ALPR deployment, focusing on targeted surveillance in high-crime areas or investing in community-based policing initiatives.

The takeaway

The growing backlash against ALPRs highlights the tension between the perceived benefits of enhanced security and the potential for privacy violations. As the legal landscape evolves, communities must carefully balance the use of surveillance technology with the protection of civil liberties.