Judges Rebuke Trump DOJ for 'Contempt' of the Law

Federal courts are pushing back on the administration's disregard for the Constitution and rule of law.

Apr. 6, 2026 at 5:12pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A cinematic painting of a solitary bronze statue of Lady Justice standing alone in an empty, dimly lit government building hallway, the figure bathed in warm diagonal sunlight and deep shadows, conceptually representing the judiciary's role as a guardian of the Constitution.As the rule of law faces increasing challenges, the courts emerge as a vital bulwark against executive overreach.Boston Today

The Justice Department under the Trump administration is facing a wave of critical rulings from federal judges across the country, who are challenging the legality of the president's policies and actions. Judges appointed by both Republican and Democratic presidents have issued strong rebukes, accusing the DOJ of making 'lawless' arguments and showing 'contempt' for the Constitution.

Why it matters

The judges' rulings have significantly slowed or halted some of Trump's most controversial initiatives, serving as a crucial check on executive power. Their critiques of the administration's 'disdain for the rule of law' highlight growing concerns about the president's disregard for democratic norms and institutions.

The details

In the past year, the DOJ has lost over 200 cases in key areas like immigration and executive authority, with judges repeatedly finding the administration's actions to be 'arbitrary and capricious.' The courts have also accused the DOJ of failing to comply with orders and undermining the government's credibility. Trump has responded by lashing out at 'rogue judges,' urging Congress to 'crack down' on them.

  • In September 2026, Judge William Young issued a scathing 161-page ruling against the administration's deportation policies.
  • Since the start of Trump's second term in 2025, the courts have issued over 210 rebukes of the DOJ's legal positions and conduct.

The players

Judge William Young

A federal district court judge in Boston appointed by Republican President Ronald Reagan. He accused the Trump administration of violating the Constitution and launching a 'full-throated assault on the First Amendment' with its deportation policies.

Michael Bromwich

A former Justice Department Inspector General who said the administration's losses in court have eroded the DOJ's long-standing presumptions of 'regularity, competence and reliability.'

J. Michael Luttig

A retired conservative federal appeals court judge who said the president's 'contempt for the Constitution, rule of law, and federal judiciary has predictably backfired' as the lower courts have become 'the last line of defense' against unconstitutional actions.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“District court judges around the country, appointed by Republican and Democratic presidents alike, are serving as the strongest guardrail against the incursions on the rule of law.”

— Michael Bromwich, Former Justice Department Inspector General

“The president's and the attorney general's contempt for the constitution, rule of law, and federal judiciary has predictably backfired on them.”

— J. Michael Luttig, Retired Federal Appeals Court Judge

“The lower federal courts are the last line of defense of the constitution and rule of law in this president's war on the rule of law.”

— J. Michael Luttig, Retired Federal Appeals Court Judge

What’s next

The administration is expected to continue appealing the lower court rulings, with many cases already reaching the Supreme Court. However, the 6-3 conservative majority on the high court has not always sided with Trump, dealing one significant blow to his tariff policy.

The takeaway

The federal judiciary's forceful pushback against the Trump administration's disregard for the law and Constitution underscores the vital role of the courts in safeguarding democratic norms and checks on executive power, even in the face of a president who has openly expressed 'contempt' for the rule of law.