Court Blocks Trump Administration's 'Sweeping' Funding Freeze

Federal appeals court upholds ruling against White House's directive to pause spending on federal financial assistance programs.

Mar. 17, 2026 at 4:10am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal appeals court largely upheld a ruling that blocked the Trump administration's 'sweeping and unprecedented' freeze on trillions of dollars in government financial assistance. The court found that the White House's budget office had improperly directed federal agencies to implement a categorical freeze on funding without considering the reliance interests of the recipients.

Why it matters

The court's decision is a significant setback for the Trump administration's efforts to roll back federal funding for programs related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change. It highlights the legal challenges the administration has faced in attempting to unilaterally freeze government spending on certain initiatives.

The details

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and D.C. in finding that the Office of Management and Budget had directed agencies to freeze funds without properly assessing whether the payments were legally required. While the appeals court largely upheld a lower court's injunction blocking the policy, it overturned part of the ruling that required agencies to make payments to the suing states, citing a Supreme Court decision indicating such lawsuits must be pursued in a different court.

  • In January 2025, shortly after Trump returned to the White House, OMB issued a memo directing federal agencies to temporarily pause spending on federal financial assistance programs.
  • In March 2025, a lower court judge issued an injunction blocking the policy.
  • On March 16, 2026, the federal appeals court largely upheld the ruling blocking the Trump administration's funding freeze.

The players

Donald Trump

The former president whose administration instituted the 'sweeping and unprecedented' funding freeze that was blocked by the courts.

David Barron

The chief judge of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals who authored the ruling largely upholding the lower court's injunction against the Trump administration's funding freeze.

John McConnell

The U.S. District Judge in Rhode Island who issued the March 2025 injunction blocking the Trump administration's funding freeze policy.

Democratic Attorneys General

Attorneys general from 22 states and the District of Columbia who sued the Trump administration over the funding freeze.

Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

The White House budget office that directed federal agencies to implement the categorical freeze on funding that was ruled improper by the courts.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The Office of Management and Budget 'directed the agency defendants to freeze such funds without considering an obvious aspect of the problem — namely, the reliance interests of the recipients of the obligated federal funds that were to be frozen.'”

— David Barron, Chief U.S. Circuit Judge

What’s next

The White House has not indicated whether it will appeal the appeals court's ruling to the Supreme Court.

The takeaway

This court decision represents a significant legal setback for the Trump administration's efforts to unilaterally freeze federal funding for programs related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change. It highlights the challenges the administration has faced in attempting to implement sweeping policy changes without properly considering the impact on funding recipients.