World Cup Faces Funding Issues as US Host Cities Quietly Scale Back Events

Major host cities like New York, Boston, and Seattle have publicly altered or scaled back their original fan festival plans.

Published on Feb. 27, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Four months before kickoff, the biggest free party of the 2026 World Cup is shrinking. What was once pitched as a continent-wide celebration is now colliding with a harder reality: security bills, licensing disputes, shifting political priorities and growing uncertainty over turnout. Major host cities including New York/New Jersey, Boston and Seattle have publicly altered or scaled back their original fan festival plans.

Why it matters

The upside for host cities depends on tourism flows, corporate hospitality demand, daily turnout at fan zones — and, in some cases, the draw itself. Several host cities are now describing a more cautious internal calculus, as the numbers don't seem to match the initial promises of economic impact.

The details

Under the 2026 hosting model, cities and states are responsible for security, policing, emergency services, permitting and operational costs tied to matches and fan festivals. Those expenses are often paid upfront, even when federal reimbursements are expected later. FIFA, by contrast, retains ticket revenue, global sponsorships, hospitality sales and broadcast income — revenue projected to surpass $11 billion. As kickoff approaches, several host cities are weighing whether to forgo official FIFA fan fests on match days after failing to land some of the tournament's most commercially powerful teams.

  • Four months before kickoff, the biggest free party of the 2026 World Cup is shrinking.
  • Last June, the FIFA World Cup 2026 NYNJ Host Committee announced that Liberty State Park would serve as the official site of the FIFA Fan Festival NYNJ.
  • Eight months later, the plan has been abandoned.

The players

Alex Lasry

CEO of the FIFA World Cup 2026 NYNJ Host Committee.

Nathaniel Styer

Communications director for Jersey City.

Stephanie McGowan

Vice Chair of the Foxborough town board.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The Governor made the right call. It became increasingly clear that there was no workable, cost-effective way to manage the influx of tens of thousands of fans into Liberty State Park, while maintaining access to the members of the Jersey City community.”

— Nathaniel Styer, Communications director for Jersey City (Newsweek)

“This is not a moneymaker for this town. In fact, it's probably more of a headache than it's worth.”

— Stephanie McGowan, Vice Chair of the Foxborough town board (Newsweek)

What’s next

In the Bay Area, organizers are weighing whether to forgo official FIFA fan fests on match days after failing to land one of the tournament's heavyweights, as they assess whether it remains a cost-efficient use of public funds and private donations. A decision on the final scope of Miami's planned fan festival at Bayfront Park may hinge on the timing of federal security funding reimbursement.

The takeaway

The World Cup is facing a funding crunch as host cities grapple with the high costs of security, policing, and operations for fan festivals, while FIFA retains the majority of the tournament's lucrative revenue streams. This is creating an imbalance, as local governments are left to absorb the financial risks if attendance projections fall short or security costs escalate.