Buc-ee's Sues Ohio Convenience Store Over Alleged Logo Infringement

Travel center chain claims Mickey Mart's moose logo too closely resembles its trademarked beaver logo.

Published on Mar. 2, 2026

The Texas-based Buc-ee's travel center chain has filed a lawsuit against Ohio-based convenience store Mickey Mart, alleging that Mickey Mart's recently adopted logo featuring a cartoon moose infringes on Buc-ee's trademarked cartoon beaver logo. Buc-ee's has a history of aggressively protecting its intellectual property, having previously filed suits against other companies it claims have used similar animal-based logos.

Why it matters

Buc-ee's is known for its aggressive protection of its brand and intellectual property, and this lawsuit is the latest example. The outcome could set precedents around what constitutes acceptable use of animal-based logos in the retail industry, and may impact Buc-ee's expansion plans in Louisiana and elsewhere.

The details

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, alleges that Mickey Mart's new logo featuring a cartoon moose is too similar to Buc-ee's trademarked cartoon beaver logo. Buc-ee's has previously taken legal action against other companies it claims have used animal-based logos that are too close to its own branding.

  • The lawsuit was filed on March 2, 2026.

The players

Buc-ee's

A Texas-based travel center chain known for its large convenience stores, gas stations, and aggressive protection of its intellectual property.

Mickey Mart

An Ohio-based convenience store chain that Buc-ee's claims has infringed on its trademarked beaver logo with a new logo featuring a cartoon moose.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on whether to allow the lawsuit to proceed.

The takeaway

This lawsuit highlights Buc-ee's commitment to protecting its brand and intellectual property, which could impact the company's expansion plans in Louisiana and elsewhere if the outcome sets new precedents around acceptable use of animal-based logos in retail.