Sparta Insurance Loses Bid to Avoid Asbestos Exposure Claims

Court rules executives may have played role in fatal asbestos exposure at Avondale shipyard

Published on Feb. 18, 2026

Sparta Insurance Co. must face claims that executives it insured at Huntington Ingalls Inc.'s Avondale, Louisiana shipbuilding facility played a role in fatally exposing a worker to asbestos in 1971. A federal judge ruled there is evidence indicating nearly all of the executives 'may have had some role in the safety program' during the worker's employment, precluding summary judgment for the insurer.

Why it matters

This case highlights the ongoing legal battles over asbestos exposure claims, which have cost companies billions in liability payouts over the decades. The ruling suggests Sparta Insurance may be held responsible for the actions of executives it covered, even if the company itself was not directly involved in the alleged safety failures.

The details

According to the court order, Michael Dandry Jr. worked at the Avondale shipyard in 1971 and was fatally exposed to asbestos. The lawsuit alleges that a group of Huntington Ingalls executives who were insured by Sparta Insurance played a role in the unsafe conditions that led to Dandry's exposure. The judge found sufficient evidence indicating 'nearly all' of the executives 'may have had some role in the safety program' during Dandry's employment, preventing Sparta Insurance from escaping the claims through summary judgment.

  • Michael Dandry Jr. worked at the Avondale shipyard in 1971.

The players

Sparta Insurance Co.

An insurance company that allegedly insured a group of Huntington Ingalls Inc. executives who ran the Avondale, Louisiana shipbuilding facility.

Huntington Ingalls Inc.

A major U.S. military shipbuilding company that operated the Avondale, Louisiana shipyard where the alleged asbestos exposure occurred.

Michael Dandry Jr.

A worker at the Avondale shipyard who was fatally exposed to asbestos in 1971.

Nannette Jolivette Brown

The U.S. District Court judge who ruled against Sparta Insurance's bid to escape the asbestos exposure claims.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The judge's ruling means the case against Sparta Insurance will now proceed to trial, where the company will have to defend itself against the allegations that the insured Huntington Ingalls executives were responsible for the fatal asbestos exposure.

The takeaway

This case underscores the continued legal liability that companies can face over historical asbestos exposure, even decades later. It also highlights the challenges insurers can encounter when trying to avoid payouts for the actions of their insured parties.