Judge Slashes Sentence for Violent Offender Citing 'Lack of Mental Health Help'

Conviction included robbery, kidnapping, sodomy, and sexual abuse, but judge reduced 65-year sentence to 30 years

Published on Feb. 11, 2026

A judge in Louisville, Kentucky has reduced the prison sentence of a 24-year-old man convicted of violent crimes including robbery, kidnapping, sodomy, and sexual abuse from 65 years to just 30 years, citing the defendant's lack of mental health support growing up. The defendant showed no remorse in court, telling the judge to "eat my d***" and saying he would "spit on you" if he could.

Why it matters

This case has sparked outrage over what many see as a lenient sentence for a violent offender, with critics arguing the judge prioritized the defendant's background over the trauma inflicted on his victims. It raises concerns about the influence of ideology on the criminal justice system and whether certain defendants are receiving more leniency based on their race or perceived disadvantages.

The details

Christopher Thompson, 24, was convicted of robbery, kidnapping, sodomy, and sexual abuse. The jury had recommended a 65-year sentence, but Judge Tracy Davis reduced it to 30 years, stating that Thompson "fell through the cracks" and did not receive enough mental health support growing up. Despite Thompson's lack of remorse, including telling the judge to "eat my d***" and that he would "spit on you" if he could, the judge said "It's fine. Okay? It's fine."

  • On February 11, 2026, Judge Tracy Davis reduced Christopher Thompson's sentence from 65 years to 30 years.

The players

Christopher Thompson

A 24-year-old man convicted of robbery, kidnapping, sodomy, and sexual abuse.

Judge Tracy Davis

The judge who reduced Christopher Thompson's sentence from 65 years to 30 years, citing his lack of mental health support growing up.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“If I could spit on you, I would.”

— Christopher Thompson (substack.com)

“Eat my d***.”

— Christopher Thompson (substack.com)

“It's fine. Okay? It's fine.”

— Judge Tracy Davis (substack.com)

What’s next

The case has sparked outrage and calls for an investigation into Judge Tracy Davis' decision-making process. It remains to be seen if the sentence reduction will be appealed.

The takeaway

This case highlights concerns about the influence of ideology on the criminal justice system and whether certain defendants are receiving more lenient treatment based on their race or perceived disadvantages, even in the face of violent crimes and lack of remorse. It raises questions about the balance between rehabilitation and accountability for victims and public safety.