Kentucky Judge Wins Bid to Halt Impeachment Proceedings

Circuit court rules impeachment petition against Judge Julie Muth Goodman failed to charge an impeachable offense.

Mar. 31, 2026 at 3:43pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A photorealistic painting of a stately Kentucky courthouse, its facade and steps cast in warm, golden light and deep shadows, conveying a sense of judicial gravity and the solemnity of the law.The Kentucky courthouse where a judge halted impeachment proceedings against a fellow jurist, preserving the separation of powers.Frankfort Today

A Kentucky circuit court judge has ruled in favor of Judge Julie Muth Goodman, halting an impeachment effort against her by state lawmakers. The court argued the impeachment petition failed to charge an impeachable offense and would usurp the checks and balances between the legislative and judicial branches.

Why it matters

This case highlights the ongoing tensions between the legislative and judicial branches, as well as the complex process for impeaching judges in Kentucky. The ruling preserves Judge Goodman's position and raises questions about the appropriate grounds for impeachment.

The details

The impeachment petition against Judge Goodman was filed by state lawmakers, who alleged unspecified misconduct. However, the circuit court judge ruled that any allegations against Goodman must be adjudicated by the Judicial Conduct Commission and the Kentucky Supreme Court, not through the legislative impeachment process.

  • The impeachment petition was filed against Judge Goodman in early 2026.

The players

Judge Julie Muth Goodman

A Kentucky judge who successfully halted an impeachment effort against her by state lawmakers.

Kentucky Circuit Court

The court that ruled in favor of Judge Goodman, halting the impeachment proceedings.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The Kentucky Judicial Conduct Commission and Supreme Court will now be responsible for adjudicating any allegations against Judge Goodman.

The takeaway

This case highlights the delicate balance between the legislative and judicial branches, and the importance of following proper procedures when seeking to remove a sitting judge from office.