U.S. Strikes Iran to Defend Against Terrorist Regime

Critics claim Israel pushed Trump into action, but president says decision was his own

Published on Mar. 5, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The U.S. has launched military strikes against Iran's terrorist regime, which has been waging war against the U.S. for 47 years. While some critics claim Israel pushed President Trump into this action, the president says the decision was his own to protect American interests from the Iranian threat.

Why it matters

Iran's Islamist government, allied with China and Russia, poses a serious threat to U.S. national security through its nuclear program, missile development, and sponsorship of international terrorism. Stopping this threat is a key priority for the U.S., regardless of Israel's position.

The details

The U.S. strikes targeted Iran's nuclear and missile facilities in an effort to degrade the regime's capabilities. This comes after failed negotiations, as the president believes Iran was planning imminent attacks. While some claim Israel influenced the timing, the administration says the decision was based on U.S. intelligence and national interests.

  • The U.S. has been negotiating with Iran for months.
  • On March 4, 2026, President Trump ordered the strikes against Iran.

The players

President Donald Trump

The U.S. president who ordered the strikes against Iran, stating it was to protect American interests and not due to pressure from Israel.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

The Israeli leader who has long advocated for action against Iran's nuclear and terrorist threats, but denies pressuring the U.S. into this specific military operation.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio

A senior U.S. official who agrees the strikes were necessary to address the Iranian threat, not just to benefit Israel.

U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth

A senior U.S. official who also supports the decision to strike Iran, citing the regime's 47-year war against the United States.

California Governor Gavin Newsom

A Democratic politician who has criticized the strikes, claiming they were done to benefit Israel rather than U.S. interests.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. They were going to attack if we didn't do it. They were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that. If anything, I might have forced Israel's hand, but Israel was ready, and we were ready.”

— President Donald Trump (White House)

“The Islamic government and its mullahs have been quite explicit about the fact that they are waging a religious war against both the 'great Satan' of the United States and the 'little Satan' of Israel for 47 years.”

— U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio (White House)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.