Federal Judge Denies NCAA's Bid to Stop DraftKings' Use of 'March Madness'

The NCAA's request for a temporary restraining order was rejected, allowing DraftKings to continue using trademarked tournament terms.

Mar. 27, 2026 at 3:24am

A federal judge in Indiana has denied the NCAA's request for a temporary restraining order to stop DraftKings from using trademarked terms like 'March Madness' and 'Final Four' to promote its online sports betting platform. The NCAA had filed a complaint last week alleging trademark infringement, but the judge ruled the NCAA failed to show how DraftKings' use of the terms would cause irreparable harm.

Why it matters

The NCAA has long sought to distance itself from sports betting, but the judge's decision allows DraftKings to continue leveraging the popularity of the NCAA basketball tournaments to attract customers. This raises questions about the NCAA's ability to control the use of its intellectual property as the sports betting industry continues to grow.

The details

The NCAA filed a complaint last week in the Southern District of Indiana, requesting a temporary restraining order to stop DraftKings from using 'March Madness,' 'Final Four,' 'Elite Eight' and 'Sweet Sixteen' in its marketing. However, Judge Tanya Walton Pratt ruled that the NCAA did not demonstrate how DraftKings' use of the terms would cause irreparable harm. DraftKings has been using the trademarked terms for over five years and argued it has the legal right to do so.

  • The NCAA filed the complaint for trademark infringement last week.
  • The federal judge denied the NCAA's request for a temporary restraining order on Thursday, March 27, 2026.

The players

NCAA

The National Collegiate Athletic Association, the governing body for college sports in the United States.

DraftKings

An online sports betting and daily fantasy sports platform.

Judge Tanya Walton Pratt

The federal judge who denied the NCAA's request for a temporary restraining order.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The NCAA's trademark infringement claims against DraftKings remain pending, and the court indicated the NCAA may be able to obtain a preliminary or permanent injunction with further evidence.

The takeaway

The judge's decision highlights the NCAA's ongoing struggle to control the use of its intellectual property as the sports betting industry continues to grow. This case underscores the challenges the NCAA faces in distancing itself from gambling while also protecting its valuable trademarks.