Indiana House, Senate to Decide Fate of Sweepstakes Casino Ban Bill

Lawmakers will meet to reconcile differences in proposed legislation that could outlaw online casino-style games in the state.

Published on Feb. 23, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Members of the Indiana House of Representatives and Senate are set to convene on February 23 to discuss a bill that would ban online sweepstakes casino sites in the state. The House and Senate have passed different versions of the legislation, and the conference committee meeting will determine whether the bill advances to Governor Mike Braun for final approval.

Why it matters

The debate over sweepstakes casinos in Indiana highlights the state's complex and often contentious relationship with gaming expansion. While efforts to legalize online casino games have stalled in recent years, the potential ban on sweepstakes sites could solidify brick-and-mortar casinos as the primary avenue for regulated gambling in the state.

The details

House Bill 1052, which aims to outlaw websites offering casino-style games based on a dual-currency sweepstakes model, was passed by both the Indiana House and Senate. However, the two chambers have yet to agree on provisions regarding changes to tobacco licensure requirements. The conference committee meeting on February 23 will determine whether the bill can be reconciled and sent to Governor Braun for his signature.

  • The Indiana Senate approved House Bill 1052 with an amendment on February 17.
  • The House declined to concur with the Senate's changes, setting up the February 23 conference committee meeting.
  • The conference committee meeting is scheduled for 11:30 a.m. Indianapolis time on February 23.

The players

Ethan Manning

Indiana Representative and sponsor of House Bill 1052.

Mike Braun

Governor of Indiana, who would receive the bill for final approval if it passes the conference committee.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.