13 Attorneys General Sue OneMain Financial Over Hidden Loan Add-Ons

Lawsuit alleges company misled customers about optional products that increased loan costs

Mar. 16, 2026 at 8:48pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A bipartisan group of 13 state attorneys general have filed a lawsuit against financial company OneMain Financial, alleging the company placed unwanted additional products and hidden costs on its loans that led to higher costs for borrowers. The lawsuit claims OneMain employees steered customers into purchasing credit insurance and other loan-related products while making deceptive claims about whether the products were required and how they could be canceled.

Why it matters

The lawsuit highlights concerns about lending practices that target financially struggling consumers and trap them in more debt through hidden fees and misleading tactics. It comes after a previous settlement between OneMain and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau over similar allegations.

The details

The lawsuit alleges that OneMain's additional products, including credit insurance and home/auto memberships, increased the overall cost of the loans. It claims the company did not properly check whether customers already had similar services through other providers. OneMain denies the allegations, stating the practices were already reviewed and resolved with the CFPB.

  • The lawsuit was filed on Monday, March 16, 2026.
  • In 2023, OneMain agreed to a $10 million settlement with the CFPB over allegations of selling add-on products to consumers.

The players

OneMain Financial

A large U.S. non-bank installment lender that primarily offers loans to consumers with subprime credit scores.

Letitia James

The New York State Attorney General who is leading the multistate lawsuit against OneMain Financial.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The lawsuit will now proceed through the court system, with OneMain vowing to vigorously defend itself against the allegations.

The takeaway

This case highlights ongoing concerns about lending practices that target vulnerable consumers and use hidden fees and misleading tactics to increase profits, even after previous regulatory actions. It underscores the importance of strong consumer protection laws and enforcement to prevent such predatory behavior.