Public Voices Concerns Over Trump's White House Ballroom Project

Federal panel hears from critics who say the $400 million plan is too big and unnecessary

Published on Mar. 5, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal panel reviewing former President Donald Trump's plans to build a 90,000-square-foot ballroom at the White House heard strong opposition from the public during a meeting on Thursday. Most of the 30 speakers who addressed the National Capital Planning Commission criticized the project as too large and unnecessary, with only one person speaking in favor of it. Concerns were also raised about Trump's plan to fund the $400 million construction cost through donations from wealthy individuals and corporations who have business before the government.

Why it matters

The public comments highlight the ongoing controversy and debate over Trump's plans to significantly expand the White House complex, which critics view as an unnecessary vanity project. The concerns raised about the funding sources also touch on broader issues of potential conflicts of interest and the influence of money in politics.

The details

The National Capital Planning Commission is reviewing Trump's plans for the ballroom, which would be built where the East Wing of the White House once stood. Trump had the East Wing demolished in October. The commission heard from 30 speakers, most of whom opposed the project, with one person speaking in favor. Criticisms included that the ballroom is too large and unnecessary. There were also concerns raised about Trump's plan to fund the $400 million construction cost through donations from wealthy individuals and corporations who have business before the government.

  • The National Capital Planning Commission held a public meeting on the project on March 5, 2026.
  • The U.S. Commission of Fine Arts approved the project last month.

The players

National Capital Planning Commission

The federal panel reviewing Trump's plans for the White House ballroom project.

Donald Trump

The former President of the United States who proposed the $400 million ballroom project at the White House.

Kye Rowan

An "ordinary citizen" who criticized the project as "ugly" and "too much."

Diane Marlin

A recently retired mayor of Urbana, Illinois who urged the commission to "send this back to the drawing board" and "take the time to get this right."

Abigail Bellows

The senior policy director for anti-corruption and accountability at Common Cause, a nonpartisan grassroots organization, who questioned the motives of the wealthy donors funding the project.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“It's ugly. It's just ugly. It's too much.”

— Kye Rowan, Ordinary citizen (WRAL)

“I urge you to send this back to the drawing board. Take the time to get this right.”

— Diane Marlin, Recently retired mayor of Urbana, Illinois (WRAL)

“Let's not kid ourselves. These donors aren't doling out millions to bankroll the president's pet project out of the goodness of their heart. We all must ask: What do they expect in return?”

— Abigail Bellows, Senior policy director for anti-corruption and accountability at Common Cause (WRAL)

What’s next

The National Capital Planning Commission is scheduled to vote on the project at its meeting on April 2, 2026.

The takeaway

The public comments highlight the ongoing controversy and debate over Trump's plans to significantly expand the White House complex, which critics view as an unnecessary vanity project funded by wealthy donors who may expect favors in return. The concerns raised touch on broader issues of potential conflicts of interest and the influence of money in politics.