- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Columbia Today
By the People, for the People
Columbia Considers Restricting Residential Solar Options
City may remove ground-mounted solar as an option for homeowners despite resident concerns
Published on Feb. 27, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The City of Columbia, Illinois is considering amending its solar energy ordinance to remove the option for residential properties to install ground-mounted solar arrays. This follows the recent denial of a permit for a ground-mounted system despite no objections from neighbors, as well as concerns from city officials about the application process and enforcement of regulations for such installations.
Why it matters
The proposed change would limit solar options for Columbia residents, potentially making it more difficult or costly for homeowners to install renewable energy systems on their properties. This raises concerns about restricting consumer choice and access to solar power in the community.
The details
A resident named John Czik was recently denied a permit for a ground-mounted solar array on his property, despite meeting city guidelines. During a City Council meeting, Alderman Steve Holtkamp argued that the decision was based solely on personal opinions about the aesthetics of ground-mounted solar, rather than any issues with Czik's specific proposal. City officials cited the complexity of the special use permit process and varying familiarity of solar installers with local regulations as reasons for potentially restricting ground-mounted systems going forward.
- In January 2026, John Czik's permit for a ground-mounted solar array was denied.
- On December 8, 2025, the Columbia Plan Commission president expressed an 'unwritten preference' for roof-mounted solar panels.
- On December 15, 2025, the City Council discussed Czik's permit and Alderman Holtkamp argued in favor of allowing ground-mounted solar.
- On February 27, 2026, the City Council was expected to vote on amending the solar ordinance on March 2, 2026.
The players
John Czik
A Columbia resident who had his permit for a ground-mounted solar array denied by the city.
Steve Holtkamp
A Columbia City Council Alderman who argued in favor of allowing residents the option of ground-mounted solar installations.
John Brancaglione
The Columbia Land Use and Planning Coordinator who explained the city's rationale for potentially restricting ground-mounted solar.
Doug Brimm
The Columbia City Administrator who echoed concerns about the solar permit application process and enforcement of regulations.
Paul Khoury
A Columbia City Council Alderman who spoke against allowing ground-mounted solar systems due to concerns about property values and aesthetics.
What they’re saying
“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”
— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)
“Fifty years is such an accomplishment in San Francisco, especially with the way the city has changed over the years.”
— Gordon Edgar, grocery employee (Instagram)
What’s next
The Columbia City Council is expected to vote on amending the solar energy ordinance to restrict ground-mounted solar systems on March 2, 2026.
The takeaway
This case highlights the tension between municipal regulations, resident preferences, and the broader goals of increasing access to renewable energy. The proposed changes in Columbia could make it more difficult and costly for homeowners to install solar, potentially limiting consumer choice and the city's progress towards sustainability.


