- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
DC's Lawsuit Over Trump's National Guard Deployment Faces Legal Hurdle
Conservative watchdog argues DC cannot sue itself as part of the federal government
Apr. 9, 2026 at 11:06am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The federal government's continued military presence in the nation's capital exposes the complex power dynamics between Washington, D.C. and its sovereign creator.Chicago TodayA conservative watchdog group has urged a federal appeals court to dismiss Washington, D.C.'s lawsuit challenging former President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to the city, arguing that the district cannot sue itself since it is part of the federal government. The case sits at the intersection of Trump's deployment of troops to blue cities and D.C.'s long-running fight for self-government.
Why it matters
The outcome of this case could have broader implications, potentially reinforcing the principle that D.C. is subordinate to the federal government and disputes should be resolved politically rather than through the courts.
The details
The Oversight Project, a conservative watchdog, filed an amicus brief arguing that D.C. lacks standing to sue the federal government over the National Guard deployment, as a municipal corporation cannot sue its 'sovereign creator.' The group says if the appeals court agrees, it would restore the normal system where D.C. must turn to the president and Congress, not the courts, to address grievances against the federal government.
- In September 2022, D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb sued, arguing Trump encroached on the city's independence.
- A three-judge appeals court panel temporarily paused a lower court's injunction against the administration while the case continues.
The players
Oversight Project
A conservative watchdog group that filed an amicus brief urging the appeals court to dismiss D.C.'s lawsuit.
Brian Schwalb
The D.C. Attorney General who sued the Trump administration over the National Guard deployment.
Donald Trump
The former president who deployed National Guard troops to D.C. and other cities in 2020.
What they’re saying
“To start, one cannot sue oneself. And that is what this case ultimately is—the United States suing itself. Moreover, it is a foundational principle of the law that a municipal corporation cannot sue its sovereign creator.”
— Oversight Project lawyers
“If the judges find our argument valid, it's going to kind of restore the normal system, which is D.C. is entirely subordinate to the federal government and these disputes are resolved politically.”
— Sam Dewey, Oversight Project lawyer
What’s next
Briefing in the lawsuit is set to stretch through May, and the appeals court could schedule oral arguments after that before making a decision on the legality of the National Guard's presence and activities.
The takeaway
This case highlights the ongoing tension between D.C.'s desire for self-governance and its status as subordinate to the federal government. The outcome could have broader implications, potentially reinforcing the principle that disputes between D.C. and the federal government should be resolved through political channels rather than the courts.
Chicago top stories
Chicago events
Apr. 9, 2026
Chicago Blackhawks vs. Carolina HurricanesApr. 9, 2026
White RoosterApr. 9, 2026
Hamilton (Chicago)




