ABA Issues Guidance on Lawyers' Duty to Disclose Judicial Disqualification Grounds

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility has issued a new formal opinion providing guidance to lawyers on their ethical duty to disclose grounds that could lead to the disqualification of a judge presiding over a case. The opinion aims to address concerns about potential conflicts of interest and promote transparency in the judicial process.

Why it matters

This guidance is significant as it helps establish clear ethical standards for attorneys when it comes to identifying and reporting potential conflicts of interest involving judges. Maintaining public trust in the impartiality of the judicial system is crucial, and this opinion seeks to ensure lawyers fulfill their professional obligations in this regard.

The details

The ABA's Formal Opinion 522 states that lawyers have an ethical duty under the Model Rules of Professional Conduct to disclose to the tribunal and opposing counsel any information they have that could reasonably call into question a judge's impartiality. This includes facts about the judge's personal, financial, or other interests that could serve as grounds for disqualification. The opinion clarifies that this duty exists even if the lawyer believes the judge would still be able to preside over the matter fairly and impartially.

• The ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility issued Formal Opinion 522 on April 8, 2026.

What’s next

The ABA's new ethics opinion is expected to be widely adopted and implemented by state bar associations across the country, further solidifying the professional standards for attorneys when it comes to judicial disqualification issues.