Attorneys Seek White House Communications in 'Broadview Six' Case

Lawyers allege Trump administration influence on charges against protesters

Mar. 13, 2026 at 5:37pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Lawyers representing the 'Broadview Six' defendants in a Chicago conspiracy case have filed a motion demanding communications from top Trump administration officials, including the White House chief of staff. The motion alleges the Trump administration has a 'track record of using indictments as a way to silence its critics' and seeks to explore potential influence on the charges brought against the protesters.

Why it matters

This case raises concerns about potential political interference in the criminal justice system, as the defense alleges the Trump administration may have improperly influenced the decision to bring charges against the protesters, who were critical of the administration's immigration policies.

The details

The motion seeks communications between law enforcement, government personnel, and White House staff, including Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, related to the defendants and their criticism of the government's immigration enforcement activities. It also requests communications between the Chicago U.S. Attorney and others regarding the decision to bring charges. The defense argues the prosecution may have been brought for 'unconstitutional retaliatory and/or selective reasons'.

  • The motion was filed on March 13, 2026.
  • A jury trial is scheduled to begin on May 26, 2026.

The players

Susie Wiles

White House Chief of Staff during the Trump administration.

Andrew Boutros

Chicago U.S. Attorney.

Katherine 'Kat' Abughazaleh

An outspoken opponent of the Trump administration's immigration policies and a Democratic candidate for Congress.

Tricia McLaughlin

The key mouthpiece for then-Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Obstructing law enforcement (which is what you just posted a video of yourself doing) isn't a First Amendment right. It's a crime.”

— White House Press Office (White House Press Release)

“Kat Abughazaleh is dishonest, desperate and demonizing law enforcement to try to get 5 minutes on MSNBC and some fundraising cash.”

— Tricia McLaughlin, Key Mouthpiece for DHS Secretary Kristi Noem (Statement)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide whether to grant the defense's request to examine the charging decisions and dismiss the counts 'with prejudice'.

The takeaway

This case highlights concerns about potential political interference in the criminal justice system and the need to ensure prosecutions are not brought for improper, retaliatory, or selective reasons, especially when they involve critics of the administration in power.