A.I. Videos Spark Concerns Over Credibility of Visual Evidence

Experts warn that the rise of high-quality A.I.-generated videos could undermine the power of documentary footage to expose the truth.

Published on Feb. 15, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The article explores the paradoxical moment where video evidence is still able to reveal important truths, even as new technologies like A.I. threaten to undermine the credibility of visual documentation. It examines how A.I.-generated videos and doctored images have been used to cast doubt on real footage, particularly in the context of high-profile incidents involving federal agents in Minneapolis. The article also discusses the legal implications of this shift, as juries have come to expect video evidence to back up claims made in court.

Why it matters

The increasing prevalence of A.I.-generated and manipulated videos raises concerns about the future of visual evidence and its role in exposing the truth. As these technologies become more sophisticated, they could be used to discredit legitimate footage and fuel conspiracy theories, posing a threat to the integrity of the legal system and public discourse.

The details

The article cites two examples to illustrate the issue. First, it describes how an A.I.-generated video of a fictional fight between Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt sparked outrage in Hollywood, with some fearing it could mark the end of traditional filmmaking. Second, it examines how bystander videos of fatal shootings by federal agents in Minneapolis undercut the government's claims about the incidents, leading to the withdrawal of agents from the area. However, the article also notes that the existence of even rudimentary A.I. images can be used to discredit real footage, as seen with the circulation of an A.I.-altered image of one of the victims.

  • In late January, Republican Senator Ted Cruz criticized the escalating rhetoric around the Minneapolis shootings, saying it 'doesn't help, and it actually loses credibility'.
  • On Thursday, a federal prosecutor asked a judge to dismiss charges in one of the high-profile prosecutions stemming from the federal surge, after video evidence undercut the claims of the officers involved.

The players

Rauiri Robinson

An Irish filmmaker and visual effects artist in Los Angeles who posted A.I.-generated videos depicting a fictional fight between Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt.

Rhett Reese

A screenwriter whose credits include the 'Deadpool' films, who expressed concern about the implications of A.I.-generated videos for the film industry.

Tom Homan

Donald Trump's border czar, who announced the withdrawal of federal immigration agents from Minnesota.

Ted Cruz

The Republican senator from Texas who criticized the escalating rhetoric around the Minneapolis shootings.

Sam Gregory

The executive director of Witness, a human-rights organization focused on gathering video evidence, who discussed the challenges that A.I. poses to such efforts.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“I hate to say it. It's likely over for us.”

— Rhett Reese, Screenwriter (X)

“Escalating the rhetoric doesn't help, and it actually loses credibility.”

— Ted Cruz, Republican Senator (Ted Cruz's podcast)

“The fact that this was almost an optimized scenario also reaffirms what a challenging moment we're in.”

— Sam Gregory, Executive Director of Witness

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow the charges against the federal agents to be dismissed.

The takeaway

The rise of high-quality A.I.-generated videos and doctored images poses a serious threat to the credibility of visual evidence, which has become increasingly important in exposing the truth and holding authorities accountable. This development could undermine the integrity of the legal system and public discourse, as it becomes easier to cast doubt on legitimate footage.