Former Chicago Mayor Spared from Testifying About CPD "Code of Silence"

Federal judge reverses order requiring Rahm Emanuel to testify in lawsuit over botched police raid

Jan. 30, 2026 at 7:07pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel will not have to testify about an alleged "code of silence" at the Chicago Police Department in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by a family whose home was wrongly raided by police in 2018. A federal judge reversed an earlier ruling that would have required Emanuel to take the stand, though the family's attorneys can still show the jury video of Emanuel's past comments acknowledging such a "code of silence" within the department.

Why it matters

The case highlights ongoing concerns about a perceived "code of silence" and lack of accountability within the Chicago Police Department, which has faced numerous lawsuits and allegations of misconduct and coverups over the years. Emanuel's testimony could have provided important context about systemic issues within the department, but the judge's reversal limits the family's ability to make that case at trial.

The details

Ebony Tate, her four children, and her mother, Cynthia Eason, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the city after a 2018 police raid on their home, accusing officers of pointing guns at the kids and traumatizing them. Attorneys for the family sought to call Emanuel as a witness due to his 2015 comments acknowledging a "code of silence" among CPD officers. However, the city's attorneys successfully argued to prevent Emanuel from testifying, and the judge ultimately reversed the earlier order requiring him to take the stand.

  • The raid on Tate's home occurred in 2018.
  • In 2015, then-Mayor Rahm Emanuel made comments about a "code of silence" within the Chicago Police Department.
  • The federal civil rights lawsuit was filed by Tate's family against the city.
  • The judge's initial order requiring Emanuel to testify was reversed on Friday, January 31, 2026.
  • Jury selection for the trial is scheduled to begin on Monday, February 3, 2026.

The players

Rahm Emanuel

Former mayor of Chicago who acknowledged the existence of a "code of silence" within the Chicago Police Department in a 2015 speech.

Ebony Tate

The plaintiff in the federal civil rights lawsuit against the city of Chicago over a botched police raid on her home in 2018.

Cynthia Eason

Ebony Tate's mother, who is also a plaintiff in the lawsuit against the city.

John Tharp

The U.S. District Judge who initially ordered Rahm Emanuel to testify, but later reversed that decision.

Chicago Police Department (CPD)

The law enforcement agency accused of maintaining a "code of silence" and engaging in misconduct and coverups.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The problem is sometimes referred to as the thin blue line. The problem is other times referred to as the code of silence. It is this tendency to ignore. It is a tendency to deny. It is a tendency in some cases to cover up the bad actions of a colleague or colleagues. No officer should be allowed to behave as if they are above the law just because they are responsible for upholding the law. Permitting and protecting even the smallest acts of abuse by a tiny fraction of our officers leads to a culture where extreme acts of abuse are more likely, just like with what happened to Laquan McDonald.”

— Rahm Emanuel, Former Mayor of Chicago (Chicago City Council)

What’s next

Jury selection for the trial is scheduled to begin on Monday, February 3, 2026. Several witnesses, including the children who were present during the raid, are still expected to be called to testify.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing challenges in addressing a perceived "code of silence" and lack of accountability within the Chicago Police Department, which has been a persistent issue despite efforts by city leaders like Rahm Emanuel to acknowledge and address the problem. The judge's decision to prevent Emanuel's testimony limits the ability of the plaintiffs to fully make their case about systemic issues within the department.