Federal Judge Bars Former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel from Testifying in Police Misconduct Trial

The ruling comes as Emanuel appears to be positioning himself for a potential 2028 presidential run.

Jan. 30, 2026 at 6:23pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal judge has reversed his earlier decision and barred former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel from being called as a witness in an upcoming civil trial over alleged police misconduct. The trial revolves around a 2018 incident where a woman, her children, and their grandmother were forced out of their home at gunpoint, despite not being targets of the raid. The judge's reversal came after the city's lawyers argued that the plaintiffs had not properly disclosed Emanuel as a witness, and that his testimony would be limited to confirming his 2015 speech acknowledging a 'code of silence' at the Chicago Police Department.

Why it matters

This case highlights the ongoing tensions between the Chicago Police Department and the community, as well as the political implications surrounding Emanuel's potential testimony. The former mayor's speech about the 'code of silence' was seen as an important acknowledgment, and his potential testimony could have provided further insight into the department's issues. However, the judge ultimately ruled that the plaintiffs had not properly disclosed Emanuel as a witness, and that his testimony would be limited in scope.

The details

The trial, set to begin on Monday, revolves around the execution of a set of search warrants in August 2018. A woman, her children, and their grandmother were forced out of their home at gunpoint, even though they were not targets of the raid and were not arrested. The plaintiffs' legal team had sought to call Emanuel as a witness, arguing that his 2015 speech about the 'code of silence' at the Chicago Police Department was relevant to their case. However, the city's lawyers insisted that the plaintiffs had not properly disclosed Emanuel as a witness, and that his testimony would be limited to confirming his previous statements.

  • On December 1, 2015, Rahm Emanuel delivered a speech acknowledging a 'code of silence' at the Chicago Police Department.
  • In 2016, then-U.S. District Judge Gary Feinerman agreed that Emanuel could be summoned as a witness in a case involving two officers who claimed they were branded as 'rats' for helping the feds build a case against corrupt cops.
  • The trial in the current case is set to begin on Monday, January 27, 2026.

The players

Rahm Emanuel

The former mayor of Chicago who delivered a speech in 2015 acknowledging a 'code of silence' at the Chicago Police Department.

U.S. District Judge John Tharp

The federal judge who initially said Emanuel 'put himself in play' with his 2015 speech, but later reversed his decision and barred the former mayor from testifying.

Ed Siskel

Rahm Emanuel's personal lawyer, who was in London and unavailable to secure Emanuel's testimony.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“As I think about it further, that does not mean that Mr. Emanuel is the only vehicle for admitting those statements. And it's not a reasonable inference to say, 'Because an exhibit is listed, the speaker in that exhibit must be intended to be a witness in the case.'”

— U.S. District Judge John Tharp (suntimes.com)

What’s next

The judge's ruling means that Rahm Emanuel will not be called to testify in the upcoming trial, which is set to begin on Monday, January 27, 2026.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing tensions between the Chicago Police Department and the community, as well as the political implications surrounding Rahm Emanuel's potential testimony. The judge's reversal of his earlier decision to allow Emanuel to testify suggests that the plaintiffs did not properly disclose him as a witness, and that his testimony would have been limited in scope.