- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Boise Surrenders Her Flag To Idaho
Boise's mayor stands firm on the Gay pride flag, clashing with state lawmakers over new flag laws.
Mar. 31, 2026 at 11:42pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
After a year of rebellion, the city of Boise has taken down its Gay pride flag in compliance with a new state law regulating which flags can be flown in cities and counties across Idaho. The liberal-led city had passed a resolution declaring the pride flag as an official city flag, but the state legislature responded by passing a new law with consequences, forcing Boise to remove the flag. The issue has been divisive, with some individuals replacing the flag with their own, and the mayor attempting to put the pride flag back up on Sunday morning. The city may now sue the state through a law firm or the ACLU to try and get an injunction to allow them to fly the flag again.
Why it matters
The Boise flag issue highlights the ongoing tensions between progressive cities and conservative state governments over LGBTQ+ representation and the limits of local control. It also raises questions about the balance of power between state and municipal governments, and whether cities have the right to defy state laws they disagree with.
The details
Last year, the Idaho Legislature passed a bill regulating which flags could be flown in cities and counties throughout the state. Instead of working with the legislature, the liberal-led city of Boise passed a resolution declaring their Gay pride flag as an official city flag, in hopes of circumventing the law. The Boise mayor told anyone who would listen that the law had no consequences, so they continued to fly the flag in violation of state law. After a year of the city failing to compromise with the legislature, the state passed a new law making it official immediately, with consequences for non-compliance. Boise officials, led by Mayor Lauren McLean, were forced to take down the flag, though the mayor later tried to put it back up on Sunday morning.
- In 2025, the Idaho Legislature passed a bill regulating which flags could be flown in cities and counties.
- Boise passed a resolution declaring their Gay pride flag as an official city flag in defiance of the state law.
- The city had a year to work on a compromise with the legislature and failed to act.
- On March 31, 2026, Idaho Governor Brad Little signed a new law making it official immediately, forcing Boise to take down the flag.
- On the same day, Boise Mayor Lauren McLean attempted to put the pride flag back up on the pole.
The players
Lauren McLean
The mayor of Boise who led the city's defiance of the state's flag law by declaring the Gay pride flag an official city flag.
Brad Little
The governor of Idaho who signed the new law regulating which flags can be flown in cities and counties across the state.
Idaho Legislature
The state legislature that passed the original law regulating flags, and then passed a new law with consequences to force Boise to comply.
What they’re saying
“The law has no consequences, so we'll continue to fly the flag.”
— Lauren McLean, Mayor of Boise
What’s next
Boise can sue the state through a law firm or the ACLU to try and get an injunction to allow them to fly the pride flag again.
The takeaway
The Boise flag issue highlights the ongoing tensions between progressive cities and conservative state governments over LGBTQ+ representation, and the complex balance of power between municipal and state authorities. It raises questions about when cities can defy state laws they disagree with, and whether local control should prevail over state mandates.



