Idaho House Committee Criticized Over 'Brownface' Testimony Incident

Advocacy groups condemn lawmakers for allowing racist demonstration during public hearing

Published on Feb. 25, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Members of the Idaho House Business Committee are facing backlash from advocacy groups over allowing a man to testify in a racist costume and brownface makeup during a public hearing on an immigration-related bill. The groups say the committee's actions amounted to an 'overtly racist' demonstration that mocked Latinos in the state.

Why it matters

The incident highlights ongoing tensions around immigration policy and the treatment of minority communities in Idaho. It also raises questions about the committee's enforcement of rules of decorum and whether lawmakers adequately addressed the racist nature of the testimony.

The details

During the public hearing, a man identified as David Pettinger approached the podium wearing a costume that included brownface makeup, handcuffs, sunglasses and a wig. He initially spoke in a fake Spanish accent, saying 'El Jefe, Amigos. No hablo ingles.' Despite committee rules prohibiting demonstrations, Pettinger was allowed to continue his testimony without the accent but remained in costume and brownface.

  • The incident took place during a public hearing on Monday.

The players

Idaho House Business Committee

The state legislative committee that held the public hearing where the incident occurred.

David Pettinger

The individual who testified in the racist costume and brownface makeup.

ACLU of Idaho

One of the advocacy groups that condemned the committee's actions.

Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates

One of the advocacy groups that condemned the committee's actions.

Idaho Queer Caucus

One of the advocacy groups that condemned the committee's actions.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

Advocacy groups have called for an investigation into the committee's actions and are demanding accountability from lawmakers. The incident is likely to further inflame debates over immigration and diversity in the state.

The takeaway

This episode underscores the need for greater sensitivity and adherence to rules of decorum among elected officials, especially when dealing with issues that impact marginalized communities. It serves as a reminder that even seemingly small actions can have significant consequences and perpetuate harmful stereotypes.