Idaho House Passes Bill to Repeal Anti-Discrimination Laws Statewide

The measure would invalidate local ordinances prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

Feb. 6, 2026 at 12:07am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Idaho House of Representatives has passed a bill that would prohibit cities and counties in the state from enacting anti-discrimination ordinances, effectively repealing existing local laws that protect LGBTQ+ individuals from discrimination. The bill now heads to the state Senate for consideration.

Why it matters

This legislation is part of a broader trend of Republican-led states seeking to limit local control and override municipal anti-discrimination policies, often in the name of protecting religious freedom. The bill's passage highlights the ongoing political and legal battles over LGBTQ+ rights across the country.

The details

House Bill 557 was quickly approved by Idaho's Republican-controlled House, with a handful of GOP members joining all Democrats in opposing it. If signed into law, the measure would invalidate anti-discrimination ordinances in Idaho's largest county as well as at least 12 cities that currently prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Supporters of the bill, like Rep. Clint Hostetler, argue that these local laws are being used to 'impose the will' of LGBTQ+ advocates on religious conservatives, while opponents like Rep. Mark Sauter say the bill is 'using a sledgehammer to kill a fly' and undermines local control.

  • The Idaho House passed House Bill 557 on February 5, 2026.
  • The bill now heads to the state Senate for consideration.

The players

House Bill 557

A measure that would prohibit Idaho cities and counties from enacting anti-discrimination ordinances.

Rep. Barbara Ehardt

An Idaho Falls Republican who ran for city council in 2013 when the community was considering an anti-discrimination ordinance.

Rep. Clint Hostetler

A Republican from Twin Falls who said gay and transgender people are using local ordinances to 'push their views onto religious conservatives'.

Rep. Mark Sauter

A Republican from Sandpoint whose hometown repealed its anti-discrimination ordinance in November 2025 after complaints about a transgender woman using the women's facilities at a local YMCA.

Rep. Monica Church

A Democratic representative from Boise who argued that the bill undermines local control and makes the state more vulnerable to 'concentrated power structures' found in neighboring states.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Because they wanted us to believe that somehow those of our friends who are LGBT would get kicked out of their housing or removed from their employment.”

— Rep. Barbara Ehardt

“This isn't about acceptance, this is about dominance. And I just see this as setting the record straight. We cannot abuse or impose the will of anything against our faith community.”

— Rep. Clint Hostetler

“I just feel like this bill is really using a sledgehammer to kill a fly.”

— Rep. Mark Sauter

“Decentralization is the principle we live by. It's the way of the West, and it's the Idaho way. This kind of law makes statists and communists salivate.”

— Rep. Monica Church

What’s next

The bill now heads to a Senate committee for consideration.

The takeaway

This legislation is part of a broader political battle over LGBTQ+ rights in Republican-led states, where lawmakers are seeking to limit local control and override municipal anti-discrimination policies in the name of protecting religious freedom. The outcome of this bill in the Idaho Senate will be closely watched as a bellwether for similar efforts across the country.