Senator Grassley Discusses Iran Conflict, Constituent Concerns

Grassley defends U.S. attack on Iranian leaders, but acknowledges opposition from Iowans

Published on Mar. 11, 2026

U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa shared his perspective on the recent U.S. and Israeli military attack on Iran, which has led to an escalating conflict in the Middle East. Grassley defended the decision to target Iranian leaders, citing intelligence about a planned gathering, but acknowledged receiving more calls from constituents opposed to the conflict than in support of it.

Why it matters

The ongoing conflict between the U.S., Israel, and Iran has significant geopolitical implications, including the potential for further military escalation and civilian casualties. Grassley's comments provide insight into the political dynamics surrounding the decision to launch the attack and the mixed reactions from his constituents in Iowa.

The details

On February 28th, the U.S. and Israel launched an attack on Iran, targeting and killing several Iranian leaders. Iran has since responded with attacks on Israel and U.S. allied states in the Gulf, including civilian sites and energy facilities. As of March 8th, seven U.S. service members have been killed, including two from Iowa. Grassley defended the decision to target the Iranian leaders, citing intelligence about a planned gathering, but acknowledged receiving more calls from constituents opposed to the conflict than in support of it.

  • On February 28th, the United States and Israel launched an attack on Iran.
  • As of March 8th, seven U.S. service members have been killed in total, including two from Iowa.

The players

Chuck Grassley

A U.S. Senator from Iowa who shared his perspective on the recent U.S. and Israeli military attack on Iran and the reactions from his constituents.

Major Jeffrey O'Brien

A 45-year-old U.S. service member from Waukee, Iowa who was killed in the conflict.

Sergeant Declan Coady

A 20-year-old U.S. service member from West Des Moines, Iowa who was killed in the conflict.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Either through American intelligence connected with Israeli intelligence, we knew that about 50 people running Iran, and the same people that have been saying, 'Death to America' for about 50 years. They had evidence that these people were going to all be gathered in one place, and they could possibly be eliminated.”

— Chuck Grassley, U.S. Senator (kciiradio.com)

“Not only continuing the conflict, but being there at all. We've had a lot more calls opposed to it than in favor of it.”

— Chuck Grassley, U.S. Senator (kciiradio.com)

What’s next

There has been no clear indication from the administration when this conflict will end.

The takeaway

Grassley's comments highlight the political tensions surrounding the U.S. and Israel's attack on Iran, with the senator defending the decision but acknowledging significant opposition from his constituents in Iowa. The ongoing conflict has led to U.S. military casualties and raises concerns about further escalation and civilian harm.