Iowa Bill Aims to Limit LGBTQ+ Curriculum in Non-Private Schools

Proposed legislation would prohibit schools from providing instruction on gender identity and sexual orientation

Published on Feb. 4, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A subcommittee of Iowa House lawmakers has advanced a bill that would prohibit all non-private schools from providing any curriculum, reading, or programs related to gender theory or sexual orientation. The bill, House File 2121, states that schools must provide 'age-appropriate' and 'research-based' instruction regarding sexuality, stress management, or interpersonal relationships for 7th through 12th grade students.

Why it matters

The proposed legislation has sparked debate, with opponents arguing it would harm the mental health of LGBTQ+ students by making them feel 'less than or improper' and preventing them from accessing trusted sources of information. Supporters of the bill claim it is about 'preserving family values' and ensuring minors are not exposed to unnecessary pressure related to sexual orientation and gender identity.

The details

The bill received opposition from religious leaders, parents, and students, as well as support from conservative, faith-based organizations. Opponents, including a student and a state representative, argued that banning these topics in schools would isolate LGBTQ+ students and prevent them from having trusted adults to talk to. Supporters, including lobbyists from the Professional Educators of Iowa and The Family Leader, claimed these topics are not appropriate for the classroom and that the bill does not limit free speech or student discussions.

  • The bill was advanced by a subcommittee of Iowa House lawmakers on Wednesday, February 4, 2026.

The players

Annie Craven

An Iowa House Representative for Dallas County hopeful who grew up not fully understanding her bisexual identity due to a lack of education on LGBTQ+ topics.

Audrey Henning

A student at Valley High School in West Des Moines who advocated against the bill on behalf of the Young Feminist Club at her school.

Jeff Anderson

A lobbyist from the Iowa Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church, which opposes the bill.

Rep. Elinor Levin

The only lawmaker in the subcommittee to oppose the bill, arguing that being queer is an important part of identity and these topics should be discussed in schools.

Nathan Arnold

A lobbyist from the Professional Educators of Iowa, which voiced support for the bill, stating that teachers do not want to have to teach students about sexual orientation and gender identity.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“I didn't know bisexual people existed when I was a kid. That didn't make me any less queer. It did make me feel very alone and isolated and different.”

— Annie Craven, Iowa House Representative for Dallas County hopeful (dailyiowan.com)

“Banning these topics might make a student feel less than or improper over something they simply cannot control. Students may not feel safe asking their parents or guardians about certain topics in their lives. Without answers, these children will go around confused and feeling ashamed of themselves and their bodies.”

— Audrey Henning, Student at Valley High School in West Des Moines (dailyiowan.com)

“Comprehensive, medically accurate, and age-appropriate instruction and information, including information relating to gender and sexual orientation, makes students better informed, healthier and safer. That content instruction can be based on science rather than political and ideological agendas.”

— Jeff Anderson, Lobbyist from the Iowa Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church (dailyiowan.com)

“To pretend that queer people do not exist is neither workable nor wise in thinking about how we care for our kids.”

— Rep. Elinor Levin, Iowa City Democrat (dailyiowan.com)

“Conversations about sexuality just are not appropriate for the school. They can take place between students in the hallways all the time, but the teachers I know usually try to steer clear of that kind of [conversation].”

— Nathan Arnold, Lobbyist from the Professional Educators of Iowa (dailyiowan.com)

What’s next

The bill will now move to the full Iowa House for further consideration and a potential vote.

The takeaway

This proposed legislation highlights the ongoing debate over the role of schools in addressing LGBTQ+ issues and the balance between parental rights, student wellbeing, and the inclusion of diverse identities in the curriculum. The outcome of this bill will have significant implications for LGBTQ+ students and their access to information and support in Iowa's non-private schools.