Iowa Lawmakers Reject Bill to Block Court Review of Laws

Proposal would have prevented judicial branch from determining constitutionality of legislation.

Jan. 27, 2026 at 8:15pm

Iowa state lawmakers have rejected a bill that would have amended the state constitution to prohibit the judicial branch from reviewing the constitutionality of laws passed by the legislature. The proposal was considered by state senators Ken Rozenboom, Matt Blake, and Jason Schultz, but ultimately did not gain enough support to move forward.

Why it matters

This decision preserves the system of checks and balances, where the courts can review the actions of the legislative branch to ensure they align with the state constitution. Blocking this judicial review could have allowed lawmakers to pass unconstitutional laws without recourse.

The details

The rejected bill would have amended the Iowa Constitution to prevent the judicial branch from determining the constitutionality of laws passed by the state legislature. This would have eliminated the ability of courts to review and potentially strike down laws that violate the state's constitution.

  • The bill was considered by Iowa state senators on January 28, 2026.

The players

Ken Rozenboom

Iowa state senator representing the Pella area.

Matt Blake

Iowa state senator representing the Urbandale area.

Jason Schultz

Iowa state senator representing the Schleswig area.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

The takeaway

The rejection of this bill preserves the system of checks and balances in Iowa, where the courts can review the actions of the legislature to ensure they align with the state constitution. This decision upholds the principle of judicial review, which is a cornerstone of American democracy.