Two Challengers Seek Seats on Georgia's Top Court

Liberal lawyers aim to unseat sitting Supreme Court justices in upcoming elections

Published on Mar. 2, 2026

A pair of liberal-leaning lawyers are running to unseat two sitting justices on the Georgia Supreme Court in upcoming elections. Former Democratic state Sen. Jen Jordan is challenging Justice Sarah Warren, while another prominent left-leaning attorney is also seeking to unseat a current member of the state's highest court.

Why it matters

The races for the Georgia Supreme Court seats are seen as important battlegrounds, as the court has significant influence over issues like voting rights, abortion access, and other key policy matters in the state. The challenges from liberal candidates could shift the ideological balance of the court if successful.

The details

On the latest episode of the 'Politically Georgia' podcast, host Greg Bluestein spoke with the two liberal-leaning lawyers who are running to unseat sitting Georgia Supreme Court justices. Former Democratic state Sen. Jen Jordan is challenging incumbent Justice Sarah Warren, while another prominent left-leaning attorney is also seeking to unseat a current member of the state's highest court.

  • The Georgia Supreme Court elections will take place in November 2026.

The players

Jen Jordan

A former Democratic state senator who is the party's nominee for Georgia Attorney General in 2022, and is now challenging incumbent Georgia Supreme Court Justice Sarah Warren.

Sarah Warren

The incumbent Georgia Supreme Court justice who is being challenged by former Democratic state senator Jen Jordan.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The Georgia Supreme Court elections will take place in November 2026, when voters will decide whether to retain the incumbent justices or elect the challengers.

The takeaway

The upcoming Georgia Supreme Court races highlight the high stakes involved, as the court's ideological balance could shift depending on the outcomes. These elections will be closely watched as they could have significant implications for the state's policies on important issues.