Prosecutors Stand by Former Militant's Conviction

But blast judge's prior conduct as prosecutor in the case

Published on Feb. 27, 2026

Georgia prosecutors are defending the 2000 murder conviction of a former Black Panther leader known as H. Rap Brown, stating that new DNA evidence still strongly points to his guilt in the shooting of two sheriff's deputies. However, they have criticized the conduct of the judge who presided over the case when he was previously a prosecutor.

Why it matters

This case highlights ongoing debates around criminal justice reform, the role of DNA evidence, and concerns about potential misconduct by prosecutors and judges, especially in high-profile cases involving civil rights activists.

The details

Prosecutors say the new DNA evidence does not exonerate H. Rap Brown, whose real name is Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin, of the 2000 murder of two sheriff's deputies in Georgia. However, they have criticized the conduct of the judge who presided over the case, Hal Hinesley, when he was previously a prosecutor involved in the initial investigation.

  • H. Rap Brown, also known as Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin, was convicted of murder in 2000.
  • The new DNA evidence was recently uncovered and reviewed by prosecutors.

The players

H. Rap Brown

Also known as Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin, he is a former Black Panther leader who was convicted of murder in 2000.

Hal Hinesley

The judge who presided over H. Rap Brown's murder trial, who was previously a prosecutor involved in the initial investigation.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The new DNA evidence does not exonerate Al-Amin of the murders.”

— Georgia prosecutors

“We have concerns about the conduct of the judge when he was a prosecutor in this case.”

— Georgia prosecutors

The takeaway

This case highlights ongoing debates around criminal justice reform, the role of DNA evidence, and concerns about potential misconduct by prosecutors and judges, especially in high-profile cases involving civil rights activists.