LNG Canada's Flaring Exceeds Permits, Raising Environmental Concerns

Facility's startup phase sees flaring volumes up to 45 times above limits, sparking debate over LNG's role in energy transition.

Apr. 10, 2026 at 3:55am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A minimalist, abstract illustration composed of bold, overlapping geometric shapes in shades of blue, green, and yellow, conceptually representing the competing economic and environmental factors at play in the LNG Canada flaring controversy.The LNG Canada flaring saga exposes the complex balance between economic growth and environmental responsibility in the energy transition.Today in Tampa

LNG Canada, the country's first liquefied natural gas export facility, has been found to exceed its permitted flaring volumes by staggering margins during its early operations. Researchers have discovered the facility's warm/wet flares were 45 times over the limit, cold/dry flares were 40 times over, and storage and loading flares were 5 times the permitted levels. This controversy highlights the tensions between economic ambition, environmental responsibility, and the complexities of transitioning to cleaner energy sources.

Why it matters

The LNG Canada flaring issue is a microcosm of the broader debate around the role of natural gas in the energy transition. While LNG is often touted as a cleaner alternative to coal, the environmental impact of the liquefaction process and persistent flaring raises questions about whether LNG is truly a bridge to a sustainable future or a detour that locks in fossil fuel dependence.

The details

LNG Canada has defended the high flaring volumes as a necessary safety measure during the facility's startup phase. However, research has found that these elevated flaring levels have persisted for months, far exceeding the typical two-year startup period seen at other LNG plants worldwide. This suggests the facility may be struggling to meet even basic environmental standards, raising concerns about the feasibility of LNG Canada's planned expansion.

  • In March 2026, LNG Canada issued 10 community notifications about flaring events lasting hours and producing visible emissions and noise.
  • Researchers have found that LNG Canada's warm/wet flares were 45 times over the permit limit, cold/dry flares were 40 times over, and storage and loading flares were 5 times the permitted levels.

The players

LNG Canada

Canada's first liquefied natural gas export facility, owned by a consortium of Shell and several Asian companies.

Laura Minet

An air quality researcher at the University of Victoria who has studied flaring volumes at LNG facilities.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“One thing that immediately stands out is the inconsistency between LNG Canada's assurances and the data. Minet's research shows that LNG facilities worldwide have startup phases characterized by large amounts of flaring, lasting about two years on average. But LNG Canada's flaring volumes are not just high—they're consistently high, which is surprising.”

— Nathanial Hackett, Author

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow LNG Canada to continue operating with the current flaring levels.

The takeaway

This controversy highlights the need for more rigorous environmental impact assessments and transparency around the true environmental costs of LNG as a transitional fuel. As the energy sector rushes to capitalize on LNG, this case serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of balancing economic growth, environmental sustainability, and public health.