Tampa Police Revise Immigration Enforcement Policy

Changes come after state officials accused the department of having "sanctuary policies"

Mar. 22, 2026 at 2:06am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Tampa Police Department has revised its immigration enforcement policies following criticism from Florida state officials. The previous policies, which included restrictions on officers sharing information about victims' or witnesses' immigration status with federal agents, were accused of conflicting with state laws. The new policy aligns more closely with state law, removing those restrictions. The police union president says the changes will have little impact on officers' daily work, as they were not actively engaged in broad-based immigration enforcement actions.

Why it matters

The dispute highlights the ongoing tensions between local law enforcement and state governments over immigration policies. While Tampa sought to balance public safety and community trust, the state accused the city of having "sanctuary" policies that violated state law. The revisions aim to resolve this conflict, but the issue speaks to the broader challenges facing law enforcement agencies as they navigate the complex and politically charged landscape of immigration enforcement.

The details

The Tampa Police Department had an agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) through a 287(g) contract, allowing local officers to carry out some federal immigration enforcement duties. However, the department's previous policies prevented officers from sharing information about victims' or witnesses' immigration status with federal agents, unless it was necessary for the investigation and the individual was uncooperative. The policies also prohibited "broad-based" immigration enforcement actions. Florida's Attorney General accused the department of having "sanctuary policies" that conflicted with state law, and demanded the policies be revised by the end of March or face penalties.

  • On Monday, March 16, 2026, the Tampa Police Department posted a revised policy that removed the restrictions on sharing information with federal agents.
  • By the end of March 2026, the Tampa Police Department was required to revise its policies to align with state law, or face potential penalties.

The players

Tampa Police Benevolent Association

The union representing Tampa police officers.

Brandon Barclay

President of the Tampa Police Benevolent Association.

James Uthmeier

Florida Attorney General who accused the Tampa Police Department of having "sanctuary policies" that conflicted with state law.

Jane Castor

Mayor of Tampa who worked to revise the police department's immigration enforcement policies.

Arturo Rios

An immigration lawyer and adjunct professor at Stetson College of Law who believes the issue was a "bit of a political overreach."

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“I think the problem with that was it ran afoul of what the federal government agreed to when you sign these documents.”

— Brandon Barclay, President, Tampa Police Benevolent Association

“I don't think that the mayor was refusing to follow the law. I really don't. I think it was more about how police were going to prioritize public safety and to make sure there was trust between police and the community.”

— Arturo Rios, Immigration lawyer and adjunct professor, Stetson College of Law

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.