- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Epstein Hid Trove of Evidence from Investigators for Over a Decade
Documents suggest the late sex offender went to extreme lengths to conceal potential evidence of his crimes
Published on Feb. 26, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
According to newly released documents, the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein appears to have successfully hidden a trove of potential evidence of his crimes from investigators for more than a decade. Internal correspondence and court filings indicate that Epstein's attorneys and private investigators removed computers, phone directories, sexual paraphernalia, and other materials from his Palm Beach home just days before a police raid in 2005, shielding the contents from law enforcement during the critical early stages of the investigation.
Why it matters
The removal of this potential evidence may have contributed to Epstein's ability to evade justice for more than a decade, as state and federal prosecutors were never able to access the materials during their investigations. The case highlights concerns about how powerful individuals can work to conceal evidence and the challenges law enforcement faces in recovering such evidence, even when they are aware of its existence.
The details
Less than two weeks before the Palm Beach Police Department raided Epstein's mansion in October 2005, a private investigator retained by Epstein's attorney removed a trove of evidence from the home, including multiple computers, more than two dozen phone directories, sexually explicit material, and other items. The detective in charge of the investigation noted that several key items were "conspicuously absent" when they executed the search warrant. An FBI agent later attested that the removed items "were purposely removed from Mr. Epstein's home in anticipation of an execution of a search warrant" and may have contained vital evidence, including potentially critical surveillance footage.
- In the fall of 2005, a private investigator named Paul Lavery removed the evidence from Epstein's Palm Beach home at the direction of Epstein's attorney, Roy Black.
- Less than two weeks after the evidence was removed, the Palm Beach Police Department raided Epstein's mansion in October 2005.
The players
Jeffrey Epstein
The late sex offender who appears to have successfully hidden a trove of potential evidence of his crimes from investigators for more than a decade.
Roy Black
A criminal defense lawyer who represented Epstein and directed the private investigator to remove evidence from Epstein's home.
Paul Lavery
A private investigator who was retained by Epstein's attorney to remove evidence from Epstein's Palm Beach home.
William Riley
A private investigator who worked for Epstein and managed multiple storage units for the financier.
Robert Critton
An attorney for Epstein who corresponded with Riley about maintaining possession of the removed materials.
What’s next
The location of the removed evidence remains a mystery, as it appears to have been passed between Epstein's representatives over the years without ever being fully recovered by law enforcement. Investigators may continue to search for the missing materials in hopes of uncovering additional evidence related to Epstein's crimes.
The takeaway
This case highlights the challenges law enforcement faces in recovering evidence that powerful individuals go to great lengths to conceal, even when they are aware of its existence. It raises questions about how Epstein was able to evade justice for so long and the need for stronger safeguards to prevent the destruction or removal of potential evidence in high-profile criminal investigations.

